You’re thinking about purchasing a best gps watch 2022, but you’re stuck in a bunch of products on the market. You don’t know how to choose the best gps watch 2022 for you. That’s not your case. That’s our case. That’s also why we’re here to walk you through how to get a good deal and bring the best gps watch 2022 to your house.
10 Best Gps Watch 2022 short list
Top 10 Best Gps Watch for 2022 Price and Features Comparison
EZON GPS Running Watch with Speed Distance Pace Alarm and Calorie Counter and Stopwatch for Men T031B01 Black
$55.99 in stock
Features
Product Dimensions | 1.97 x 1.97 x 0.6 inches |
Item Weight | 2.08 ounces |
ASIN | B013DU1FPW |
Item model number | T031A01 |
Batteries | 1 Lithium Metal batteries required. |
Best Sellers Rank | #206,653 in Sports & Outdoors (See Top 100 in Sports & Outdoors) #505 in Activity & Fitness Trackers #2,231 in Electronics & Gadgets |
Is Discontinued By Manufacturer | No |
Connectivity technologies | GPS |
GPS | True |
Special Features | Stopwatch, Calorie counter |
Other display features | Wireless |
Colour | Black |
Manufacturer | EZON |
Country of Origin | China |
Date First Available | January 1, 2016 |
- ▶【USER BENEFIT】GPS running watch is one of the essential tools any athlete needs to improve running performance
- ▶【HIGHLIGHT】GPS running watches calculate your running pace and distance automatically,help you see your progress and stay motivated
- ▶【LED...
Amazfit GTS 2 Mini Smart Watch for Men Android iPhone, Alexa Built-in, 14-Day Battery Life, Fitness Tracker with GPS & 70+ Sports Modes, Blood Oxygen Heart Rate Monitor, 5 ATM Water Resistant-Black
$84.99 in stock
Features
Product Dimensions | 1.59 x 1.4 x 0.41 inches |
Item Weight | 1.12 ounces |
ASIN | B08PCYKXV5 |
Item model number | 0850022570100 |
Batteries | 1 Lithium Polymer batteries required. (included) |
Best Sellers Rank | #1,308 in Electronics (See Top 100 in Electronics) #58 in Smartwatches |
OS | Amazfit OS |
Wireless communication technologies | Bluetooth |
Connectivity technologies | Bluetooth, GPS |
GPS | True |
Special Features | Sleep Monitor, Daily Workout Memory, Oxymeter (SpO2), Stress Tracking, Cycle Tracking, Notifications, Phone Call, Alarm Clock, Text Messaging, Calendaring, Music Player, Multisport Tracker, Email, GPS, Heart Rate Monitor |
Display technology | AMOLED |
Other display features | CE |
Device interface - primary | Touchscreen |
Form Factor | Watch |
Colour | Midnight Black |
Battery Power Rating | 220 |
Included Components | User Manual, Charger, Smart Watch |
Manufacturer | Amazfit |
Country of Origin | China |
Date First Available | December 1, 2020 |
- 【BUILT IN AMAZON ALEXA & GPS】You can talk to Amazon Alexa on your Amazfit GTS 2 Mini Smart Watch. Ask questions, get translations, set alarms, and timers, create shopping lists, check the weather, control your smart home devices, and more. Get precise tracking on your daily steps,...
Garmin 010-02064-00 Instinct, Rugged Outdoor Watch with GPS, Features Glonass and Galileo, Heart Rate Monitoring and 3-Axis Compass, Graphite
$161.88 in stock
Features
Product Dimensions | 1.8 x 0.6 x 1.8 inches |
Item Weight | 1.76 ounces |
ASIN | B07HYX9P88 |
Item model number | 010-02064-00 |
Batteries | 1 Lithium Metal batteries required. (included) |
Best Sellers Rank | #320 in Electronics (See Top 100 in Electronics) #1 in Handheld GPS Units |
Is Discontinued By Manufacturer | No |
GPS | True |
Special Features | Heart Rate Monitoring, Shock Resistant, Barometric Altimete, Activity Tracker, GPS, Water Resistant |
Other display features | Wireless |
Device interface - primary | Buttons |
Scanner Resolution | 128 x 128 pixels |
Colour | Graphite |
Included Components | Documentation, Instinct, Charging/data cable |
Manufacturer | Garmin |
Date First Available | October 11, 2018 |
- Rugged GPS watch built to withstand the toughest environments
- Constructed to U.S. Military standard 810G for thermal, shock and water resistance (rated to 100 meters)
- Built in 3 axis compass and barometric altimeter, plus multiple global navigation satellite systems...
Garmin 010-01689-00 Forerunner 35; Easy-to-Use GPS Running Watch, Black
$97.99 in stock
Features
Product Dimensions | 1.4 x 0.5 x 1.6 inches |
Item Weight | 1.6 ounces |
Domestic Shipping | Item can be shipped within U.S. |
International Shipping | This item can be shipped to select countries outside of the U.S. Learn More |
ASIN | B01KPUHBK6 |
Item model number | 010-01689-00 |
Batteries | 1 CR123A batteries required. (included) |
Best Sellers Rank | #1,399 in Electronics (See Top 100 in Electronics) #6 in Running GPS Units #49 in Electronics & Gadgets |
Is Discontinued By Manufacturer | No |
OS | Ios, Android |
Connectivity technologies | Bluetooth |
Special Features | Bluetooth |
Other display features | Wireless |
Device interface - primary | Dial |
Scanner Resolution | 128 x 128 |
Colour | Black |
Included Components | Forerunner 35, Charging/data clip, Manual |
Manufacturer | Garmin |
Country of Origin | Taiwan |
Date First Available | August 31, 2016 |
- Easy-to use GPS running watch tracks how far, how fast and where you run
- Estimates heart rate at the wrist, all day and night, using Garmin elevate wrist heart rate technology
- Connected features: Smart notifications, automatic uploads to Garmin Connect, live tracking and...
Garmin Forerunner 735XT, Multisport GPS Running Watch With Heart Rate, Black/Gray
Features
Product Dimensions | 0.47 x 1.75 x 1.75 inches |
Item Weight | 1.6 ounces |
Domestic Shipping | Item can be shipped within U.S. |
International Shipping | This item can be shipped to select countries outside of the U.S. Learn More |
ASIN | B01DOJDPQY |
Item model number | 010-01614-00 |
Batteries | 1 CR2 batteries required. (included) |
Best Sellers Rank | #343 in Sports & Outdoors (See Top 100 in Sports & Outdoors) #2 in Running GPS Units #13 in Electronics & Gadgets |
Is Discontinued By Manufacturer | No |
OS | Ios, Android |
Wireless communication technologies | Bluetooth |
Connectivity technologies | Bluetooth |
Special Features | Bluetooth |
Other display features | Wireless |
Device interface - primary | Buttons |
Scanner Resolution | 215 x 180 |
Colour | Black/Gray |
Included Components | Forerunner 735XT, Charging/data clip, Manual |
Manufacturer | Garmin |
Country of Origin | Taiwan |
Date First Available | May 11, 2016 |
- GPS running watch with multisport features
- Estimates heart rate at the wrist so you can run freer on race day.Shock resistant. Battery life : Smartwatch Mode Up to 11 days. GPS mode Up to 14 hours. UltraTrac mode Up to 24 hours without wrist heart rate
- Provides advanced...
Ticwatch E3 Smart Watch Wear OS by Google for Men Women Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100 Platform Health Monitor Fitness Tracker GPS NFC Mic Speaker IP68 Waterproof iOS Android Compatible
$149.99 in stock
Features
Product Dimensions | 1.73 x 1.85 x 0.5 inches |
Item Weight | 1.13 ounces |
ASIN | B09575N1M5 |
Item model number | Ticwatch E3 |
Batteries | 1 Lithium Ion batteries required. |
Best Sellers Rank | #10,548 in Electronics (See Top 100 in Electronics) #439 in Smartwatches |
OS | Wear os by google |
Wireless communication technologies | Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, NFC |
Connectivity technologies | Bluetooth |
GPS | True |
Special Features | 100+ professional workout modes, Navigate your routes without the phone, Speaker & Microphone |
Other display features | Wireless |
Device interface - primary | Microphone |
Scanner Resolution | 360 x 360 |
Included Components | 1 x USB Charging Cable, 1 x TicWatch E3 Smartwatch, 1 x User Manual |
Manufacturer | Mobvoi |
Country of Origin | China |
Date First Available | April 12, 2021 |
- 【Updated Chipset, Better Experience】 Wear OS by Google smartwatch with the Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100 Platform and Mobvoi dual processor system. 1G RAM and 8G ROM enable smoother performance and more precise interactions. NFC payment supports Google Pay.
- 【New Model-Family...
Ticwatch Pro 3 Ultra GPS Smartwatch Qualcomm SDW4100 and Mobvoi Dual Processor System Wear OS Smart Watch for Men Blood Oxygen Fatigue Assessment 3-45 Days Battery NFC Mic Speaker
Features
Product Dimensions | 1.85 x 1.89 x 0.48 inches |
Item Weight | 10.2 ounces |
ASIN | B09FXRR32P |
Item model number | Pro 3 Ultra GPS |
Best Sellers Rank | #4,123 in Electronics (See Top 100 in Electronics) #194 in Smartwatches |
Date First Available | October 13, 2021 |
Manufacturer | Mobvoi |
Country of Origin | China |
- 【Long Battery Life】Dual layers display 2.0 technology keeps Ticwatch Pro 3 Ultra GPS smartwatch going up to 72 hours in Smart Mode and 45 days in Essential mode. The new customizable backlight offers you better visual enjoyment, makes the screen comfortable to read under any conditions,...
TicWatch GTH Pro Smartwatch Arty Heart Health and Dual Sensor Technology 5ATM Waterproof GPS Fitness Tracker with Heart Rate & Sleep Monitor Blood Oxygen for Men Women iOS/Android Compatible
Features
Product Dimensions | 1.7 x 1.39 x 0.41 inches |
Item Weight | 5.6 ounces |
ASIN | B08YK4Y4VX |
Batteries | 1 Lithium Ion batteries required. (included) |
Best Sellers Rank | #62,938 in Electronics (See Top 100 in Electronics) #1,651 in Smartwatches |
Date First Available | March 1, 2022 |
Manufacturer | Mobvoi |
Country of Origin | China |
- 【New Feature: Arty Heart Health and Dual Sensor Technology】TicWatch GTH Pro is the world’s first smart wearable to feature-dual PPG sensors that provide unique, user-specific insights into arterial health and other biometrics through high-fidelity sensing points both on the wrist and...
Garmin Forerunner 45, 42mm Easy-to-use GPS Running Watch with Coach Free Training Plan Support, Black
$118.00 in stock
Features
Product Dimensions | 1.65 x 1.65 x 0.45 inches |
Item Weight | 1.28 ounces |
Domestic Shipping | Item can be shipped within U.S. |
International Shipping | This item can be shipped to select countries outside of the U.S. Learn More |
ASIN | B07R2YWVW8 |
Item model number | 010-02156-05 |
Batteries | 1 CR123A batteries required. (included) |
Best Sellers Rank | #827 in Electronics (See Top 100 in Electronics) #5 in Running GPS Units #28 in Electronics & Gadgets |
Connectivity technologies | GPS |
GPS | True |
Special Features | Sleep and Stress Monitoring; Receive Text and Call Alerts; Incident Detection and Remote Assistance, Track Runs with Built-In GPS; 24/7 Heart Rate Monitoring; Record Distance, Pace, and Intervals |
Display resolution | 208 x 208 |
Other display features | Wireless |
Device interface - primary | Buttons |
Scanner Resolution | 208 x 208 pixels |
Colour | Black |
Included Components | Forerunner 45; Charging Cable; Documentation |
Department | Unisex-Adult |
Manufacturer | Garmin |
Country of Origin | Taiwan |
Date First Available | April 30, 2019 |
- Easy to use running watch estimates heart rate at the wrist and features GPS to track your pace, distance, intervals and more
- Works with free Garmin coach adaptive training plans that bring expert, personalized coaching right to your wrist
- Connected features include...
Garmin Instinct Solar Tactical, Rugged Outdoor Smartwatch with Solar Charging Capabilities and Tactical Features, Built-in Sports Apps and Health Monitoring, Moss Green
$279.99 in stock
Features
Product Dimensions | 0.6 x 1.77 x 1.77 inches |
Item Weight | 1.87 ounces |
Domestic Shipping | Item can be shipped within U.S. |
International Shipping | This item can be shipped to select countries outside of the U.S. Learn More |
ASIN | B089YVVFP4 |
Item model number | 010-02293-14 |
Batteries | 1 Lithium Polymer batteries required. (included) |
Best Sellers Rank | #18,883 in Electronics (See Top 100 in Electronics) #49 in Handheld GPS Units |
Wireless communication technologies | Bluetooth |
Connectivity technologies | GPS |
GPS | True |
Special Features | Power Manager, Stealth Mode, GPS, Sleep Monitor, Heart Rate Monitor, Stress Tracking, ABC Sensors, Notifications, Calendaring, Accelerometer, Body Temperature Monitor, Compass, Calorie Tracker, Distance Tracker, Pedometer, Night Vision Compatibility, Solar Charging |
Display resolution | 128 x 128 |
Other display features | Wireless |
Device interface - primary | Buttons |
Scanner Resolution | 128 x 128 pixels |
Colour | Moss Green |
Included Components | Instinct Solar; Charging/data cable; Documentation |
Department | Unisex-adult |
Manufacturer | Garmin |
Country of Origin | Taiwan |
Date First Available | July 8, 2020 |
- Solar charging capabilities allow you to extend battery life beyond traditional charging
- Rugged GPS Watch is water-rated to 100 meters and constructed to U.S. military standard 810 for thermal, shock and water resistance
- Built-in 3-axis compass and barometric altimeter...
How To Buy The Best Gps Watch In 2022
As there are so many different types of best gps watch 2022 available on the market, it can often be challenging for you to decide which is the best gps watch 2022.
But wait, you don’t have to worry. Here are our tips.
There are some specific criteria that you can consider when buying the best gps watch 2022. Paying attention to them will help you make a quicker and more reasonable decision.
1. Budget
As there are various models of best gps watch 2022 on the market, their price certainly varies significantly. Thus, it is necessary that you should take into account your budget. However, you don’t have to worry too much. As there’s a wide range of prices, it also means that it won’t be that hard to find the best best gps watch 2022 within your budget. Just a reminder: You should remember that an affordable best gps watch 2022 may not offer some valuable features that you want. Meanwhile, you may get a better deal with a versatile best gps watch 2022 when you can spend a bit more money.
2. Brands
When scrolling through the Internet for best gps watch 2022, you may be overwhelmed with hundreds of brands, right? But wait, let me tell you something. We have researched and rounded up a list of the most reliable and trustworthy brands.
Here are our top picks: Apple, Garmin, Unknown, Fitbit, Fossil, Amazfit, ANDFZ, Tracki, LIGE, NAVPAL, Rgthuhu, TERAMI, tractive, BAUISAN, Kimnix, PTHTECHUS.
We tried and tested a significant number of products from many different brands available on the market. Also, we did check the global ratings and reviews on Amazon about each product before ultimately choosing these brands.
Check out our list and opt for the best best gps watch 2022 for your house.
3. Warranty
You bought a best gps watch 2022 and already used it for a while. Then there’s something wrong with your best gps watch 2022. What can you do in this situation?
Make sure that you did check the warranty terms of your best gps watch 2022 before making a purchase.
Not all manufacturers offer warranty terms with their products. Moreover, it also depends on each company regarding the length and the extent of the coverage of warranties.
Will you feel secure when your best gps watch 2022 will be warranted for several years? If so, remember to pay attention to warranty terms before buying the best gps watch 2022.
The Gps Watch Tips and Advice
FAQ for Gps Watch In 2022
Warranty
We are all about product reviews. We do not sell any items.
The seller is responsible for the warranty of the products you buy. If you encounter any problems with your purchased product, please visit “here.”
Final Though
Find best price for shopping now!
- Top Kwikset 916 Contemporary Z-wave Smart Lock (2023 Review)
- Grey Sideboard 2023: Buyer’s Guide And Recommendations
- Best Smart Lock For Ring 2023: Picks From Wild River Review
- Imagic Touch Smart Deadbolt Lock 2023: Reviews, Buying Guides & Top Picks
- Handle For Recliner Chair 2023 – Our Expert
- 14 black and white checkered christmas tree passed our test 2023
- Laptop Table For Recliner Chair in 2023 – Reviews, Top picks & Guide
- 14 Best Recliner Chair For Sciatica of 2023: TOP Budget and Deal for your needs
- Cuddle Recliner Chair in 2023, Tested In Our Lab
- Mid Century Modern Bar Cabinet 2023 – Our Expert
- Mini Silver Christmas Tree 2023: Expert’s Choices
- 120v Pool Heat Pump 2023: Reviews And Rankings For You
- The Tall Bar Cabinet 2023 You Should Know About
- 17 smart door lock black friday 2023 – Top Brands Rated
- 110 Volt Pool Heat Pump in 2023: Top-Rated & Reviews
I bought this watch to have a relatively inexpensive watch that sets time to the GPS time signal (rather than to use GPS to track workouts, although the watch can do that, too). The GPS time signal is sourced from an atomic clock on a GPS satellite, and so can be considered a validated reference time that doesn’t drift. It’s what your smart phone uses.For GPS time, the watch works well. To set the time (after initially choosing your time zone — that part is not automatic), just hold the GPS button (right middle button). The watch will beep and start to search for the satellite signal. Let go of the button when you hear the beep. The watch almost always finds the signal within a couple minutes, often faster (works reliably). It then beeps again. The time is automatically set to the GPS time signal. A second button press (left middle button) then cancels GPS mode. Simple! Once out of GPS mode the battery will last months on a single charge. Then, a rapid charge with the clever included cable (it clips to the watch rather than making you fiddle with a plug) is all that’s needed. I set the watch to the GPS signal once a day when I leave my house for work and it stays accurate to the second all day. I charge it once a month or so.Overall, you get accurate timekeeping and with much less frustration than watches that automatically set using the NIST long wave radio time signal (such as Casio Waveceptor). Buy a GPS time Casio and you’re looking at a four-figure price.The Ezon is stylish and easy to read, too, with an attractive negative LCD face and clean lines. The face can display just the hours/minutes, or also include the date or a numeric display of seconds. In all modes, a subtle LCD second “hand” progresses around the perimeter of the face.The watch is water resistant and very easy to clean. Lysol or rubbing alcohol won’t mar the finish. Wash it under a faucet with no problem.Shipping from China was much faster than promised.I thought there must be a downside so I waited a good while before reviewing — nope, it’s still working great and looking like new. I recommend it!
If you’re not into long reviews, the title of this review pretty much sums it up.I’ve only had this watch for a week, but researched for months and knew exactly what features I was looking for.First, my main use cases:Running, swimming, cycling; but majority running. I used to do Triathlon’s but just run and swim now mainly for health (and honestly stress relief). I wanted an activity tracker also and liked the idea of an optical heart rate sensor. Some limited smart watch functionality would be nice also. But definitely waterproof, built in GPS for running, and basic stop-watch functionality and something I could wear 24/7 as a daily watch also.Watches I was considering:Apple Watch, Forerunner 235, 735x, Fenix 3 HR, TomTom Mult-Sport Cardio, TomTom Spark, TomTom Spark+Music, Suunto Sparten, Ambit 3, etc. pretty much any of the GPS sport watches, ideally with the optical heart rate. I don’t train hard or by heart rate really, and have had the chest straps in the past; just liked the idea of checking my resting heart rate at times and the activity tracker that comes on most of these sport watches.Also, the Apple Watch was out, unless I went with the Waterfi version (waterproof version of it at @ $600). Of course, as I’m writing this, the new Series 2 Apple Watch was announced which is waterproof and has built in GPS. Which, may have altered my decision. I am an iPhone user, but in the end, regardless, I don’t really care for the Apple Watch look and am glad I chose the 735xt.I was able to visit a local REI and try on all the Garmin devices. I REALLY love the Fenix 3 HR and the style, but I have small wrists (6.5″) and in the end, it was just too large. It wouldn’t even fit under the cuff of my basic dress shirt, and didn’t see myself wearing it to bed to take advantage of the sleep functionality. The TomTom’s didn’t really look like I could wear them every day as a watch. I did consider the TomTom Spark Cardio + Music as I liked the idea of not having to carry my phone. But then I really decided that I carry my phone not only for the music, but also in case of emergency.The Garmin VivoActive HR had everything I wanted and cheaper, and even would have liked the idea of having golf (even though I haven’t golfed in 10 years), but it’s just darn ugly (IMO).In the end, it really came down to the Garmin 235 vs 735xt. And whether the multi-sport and swimming functionality of the 735 was worth an extra $120. And so obviously I decided on the 735xt. Which I’m glad I did because it works awesome in the pool. For me it just came down to whether or not I wanted to track distance in the pool instead of just time and if that was worth $120.Here’s been my experience with it, using it for 7 days now.Pros:- Looks OK to wear as an everyday watch- Light (very light, which may also be somewhat of a con for some, see below)- Pool Swim function counts distance and time (love how you just enter the pool size and it automatically keeps track of the distance, knowing when you make a turn)- Connect IQ, this is where you can download watch faces, apps, widgets, data fields, etc. I’ve added a different watch face and use a stopwatch, timer app that I got from the IQ store. I use the stopwatch and timer a lot plus I’ve added a nice data field for running that shows HR (and color for zone), Pace, Cadence, Time, Distance all on the same screen- Has some basic smart watch features. Email, calendar notifications, music controls for phone, etc. I really wanted these features in a watch, but have realized since wearing that I just turned them all off. Honestly, I get bugged enough with text and emails and don’t need my watch distracting me also. So I just leave it on do-not disturb, as I do with my phone also when I’m running. Although the watch does have a user profile setting where you can set your sleep hours, so it sets the watch to do-not-disturb automatically during these times- Garmin Connect Mobile App. Pretty good app, full of data and makes it easy to install and customize watch faces. Many watch faces allow you to customize them (how and what data is displayed, basic colors, etc.). It’s pretty awesomeCons:- Only con I can really think of is that the Garmin weather widget on the watch is not working for me. I did download a 3rd party weather widget, but it’s not as dynamic as the Garmin version and only shows temp (hi/low) for the day. This is apparently common and happening with other users, so I’m pretty sure Garmin will have a firmware or software fix for this sometime soon. And I’ve tried about all the troubleshooting fixes I could find (e.g. location services, etc.) on the internet and Garmin forums.Now about the form factor and weight. It is plastic. And this may be a be negative for some. I remember trying on the display model at REI and it felt like a toy. Of course I know these display versions are basically shells and not the real thing, but even the real thing feels a bit like a toy. So if you want a heavy, steel, metal or oversize watch, this probably isn’t for you.The last 2 watches I’ve worn were a G-Shock GW2310FB-1CR and for about 5 years a Lunimox Colormark Chrono (BO) every day. I like light watches. And for me, this Garmin 735xt is light, comfortable, and even though a bit “plastic” feeling… because I guess it is, it fits my use case perfectly. And if it ever breaks, I’m lucky enough to live about 30 minutes from Garmin’s world headquarters and have heard good stories from friends who’ve taken their Garmin devices out there for service.Battery LifeThe specs say a bunch of different things, 14 hours in activity mode with GPS, 11 days in watch mode (activity tracking, smart notification, etc.) But here’s what I’ve gotten from the first week. From a full charge and daily activity I went about 4 days and it was at 25%. But that’s been with me fiddling with the watch a lot.I did a full charge of the watch on a Sunday. Did 8 mile run on Monday, 1000 Meter Swim on Tuesday, 5 Mile Run on Wednesday, 1000 meter swim on Thursday and by Thursday evening it was about at 25% and in the evening it beeped and said “save power mode”, which I wasn’t quite sure what that was at the time so I went ahead and put it on the charger. Looking like it’s about 10-12% per day with at least a 30-45 minute activity with GPS each day. Keep in mind I have activity tracking, continuous heart rate monitoring, and use the stopwatch and countdown timer a few times during the day also.I hope this review helps. I researched (and obsessed) for months on which one of these to buy; weighing features style and price. Of course I’m biased now as I purchased the 735xt, but as of yet have no buyers remorse.So why not 5 stars? I really never give anything 5 stars, but if the weather widget would have worked out of the box I probably would have.
Synopsis: Overall, this is a good, basic running/ fitness watch that makes a nod at also being a smart watch. There is nothing flashy here. The watch doesn’t do color, just back and silver/white on the display. For those who have used or who remember the traditional Kindles, this is actually pretty nice in terms of contrast as it is easy to ready in low light and high light conditions. In the dark, you still need the light from the lighting button. Unless you are a pro/ elite level runner who will use the advanced features of the higher end watch offerings from Garmin or their competitors, or are someone who doesn’t mind paying an absurd amount for a the latest tech gadget, this watch is more than adequate when paired with external sensors such as the HRM Run. As you read this, please bear in mind that I haven’t had the opportunity to run the higher end models, so my only points of comparison are the spec sheets and the price points. I will try to avoid providing second hand anecdotal evidence for or against them.What’s Good:– The weight. This watch is very light. Unlike my dive watches and other larger, necessarily robust watches, this guy is light enough that I don’t feel a need to take it off to type or when doing wood work (both activities that involve repetitive motions that become annoying with larger watches on. For those who mind having something heavy on your wrist during a run, that won’t be an issue with this watch.– The Band. The silicon band that comes with the watch seems to be robust and is stretchy and comfortable. I have had sport watches in the past that became uncomfortable in hot conditions after a while as moisture built up under the bands making them itchy or painful. To date, I have had no such problems with this watch. I also like the securing ring on the band which has a tooth on the inside to lock it into one of the fitment holes. The stretchiness is important as you need the watch snug/tight to adequately place the optical heart rate monitor.– The Smartwatch functions. I don’t own an apple watch (which wouldn’t work with my phone anyway) or a Gear S3, so I don’t have a basis for first hand comparison. However, I have observed the frustration of my friends and family with such devices when trying to use them for input tasks (two way communications with the cellular device.) This watch passes on notifications from your phone, but you have no ability to respond with it. For me, this is the best of both worlds. I get to keep situational awareness while avoiding getting caught up in the minutia of responding with a yet smaller computer interface. This is a personal preference, but I do like the way it works. It is also nice that notifications turn off during a run.– The interface. The UI (User Interface) is menu driven. It took me only a few minutes to get used to it, so it has to be fairly simple. Overall, it is intuitive once you absorb the designer’s logic, you just have to be patient. It does not have a touch screen, so you have to use the buttons. This isn’t a problem for me.– The GPS. Because this is a lower end offering, the watch only uses the GPS constellation and not the GLONASS constellation (Russian GPS). As a result link up times are a little slower and accuracy can be degraded as the US places a mandatory limit on how accurate civilian GPS instruments can be (its a strategic thing.) Overall, this watch isn’t too bad. At the end of my recent runs, the watch is generally off by about .03 to .05 miles from my phone which uses both locating systems and you can see the differences in the map. Part of this is, I am sure, due to the frequency of updates which is not user changeable unlike on the higher end devices (I would love to minimize the time between fixes.)– External Sensors. You can still use external sensors with this watch. I love this feature as I prefer the HRM Run over the watch which has its own accelerometer. This becomes very nice when I’m pushing my daughter in a running stroller. For bikers, you could also use a cadence sensor.– Movement Tracker. I like to track steps. As a teacher though, I take everything out of my pockets when I get in front of a class so I don’t fidget with it, so its nice that the phone will continue tracking for me. Its also nice that it will tell me if I’ve been sitting too long. This is good for two reasons. Research shows that you start to lose focus and effectiveness after about 50 minutes of continuous concentration, so its a reminder to take a break (the movement bar seems to ping after about 45 to 50 minutes). Its also a great reminder to remain active instead of just sitting there like a lump on a log.– Battery life. The phone is advertised as having up to a 13 day battery life. I haven’t seen it. However, it does seem to last about 5 days with workouts which draw significantly more power than standard operation.– Charging. The charging of this device is impressive. My first forerunner, the venerable F405, had to charge on a cradle that was poorly designed and didn’t positively engage the device. Over time, the connections would degrade and eventually stop working. The new version uses a clip that actively clamps onto the watch. Even with oxidation, it should last a long time. The other part of the equation is the speed of charging. In this aspect, the watch charges very quickly. My personal experience is that a full charge takes less than 1 hour. So if I’m at my desk and notice that my watch is low, I can put it on to charge and have it back on my wrist in time for my next break.What’s not?– User control. The sacrifice you make to get a robust watch is that you sacrifice control. You can still adjust view fields on the exercise screens, but can’t change how often the watch takes position fixes which would affect accuracy. There are some other little niggly bits of control that are sacrificed as well, but they are well hidden. Now, that having been said, how much control does the average user really need? If you ask the fruit company, they will tell you not much.– Accuracy. As mentioned with the pros, the watch is not quite as accurate as I have come to expect from my phone. However, it is within the tolerance of the system so really, how much are you missing?– User feedback. The watch does not provide the same level of feedback as the higher level watches. Such esoteric values as VO2, Lactate threshold, expected recover time, and foot contact time simply are not measured. Now, here’s the thing. If you are an elite level athlete or a professional, or have a personal coach that actually cares about this stuff, you might care. If you are an every day runner or biker out for fitness and fun or a weekend warrior out to train for your local half, do you really need that extra information and will it be of benefit to you? This is a question you have to ask yourself. My answer was clearly no. Now that having been said, the higher end watches all rely on the chest strap sensor to develop those metrics. Would it be possible for Garmin to move the calculation muscle to your paired analysis device (computer or smart phone)? Well, the answer is that there is nothing technically in the way, so clearly it is a selling point for their higher end lines. Will it show up on Garmin Connect in the future? Who knows.– Limited activities. The watch has limited workout options: Run outdoor, Run indoor, Bike, Cardio, and Walk. If you are looking for something that will track your cross fit WOD, this may not be your baby. Nor is it really designed to track golf, basketball, Frisbee golf, ultimate Frisbee or weight lifting as separate activities. Of course, most of the devices that are built around that desired capability are not reported to work well in that application. If you really want something that has specialized tracking capabilities for a wide variety of sports, by all means, pay for the higher end models.– Garmin Connect. Perhaps I’m just getting used to it, but Garmin Connect has some issues in the way that it appears on my phone. It tends to be difficult to navigate and can be hard to get it to sync.– Only two potential watch faces. There are two built in watch faces and there are no options to be able to create your own. This would be worse if I cared more, but I personally like the simple, in your face faces that are standard with the watch. The higher end watches have infinitely adjustable faces.Wrap up. Over all, I am very happy with this watch. It is the rare blend of having most of the features that I wanted and all of the capabilities that I need, while maintaining a reasonable price point without having to turn to the factory reconditioned items that may have been a lemon to begin with. I highly recommend this watch/ fitness tracker. If you don’t believe me, check out the consumer reports review of this watch.
If you’re a casual runner considering this watch just buy it.Sure it’s got a Soviet era technology vibe to it and it’s no-frills but do you really need more?PROS-Always on screen. Sure it’s not color but no wrist acrobatics are required to turn on the screen. Clear contrast and large numbers make viewing a pleasure when running.- Buttons. Ain’t nobody got time for a touchscreen during a run. Do yourself a favor here and get something with physical buttons.- Long battery life. Monochrome screen = Good battery life.- Price. Garmin is expensive and a lot of times overpriced. This is one of the cheapest ways to get into the Garmin ecosystem.- Ability to pair with external sensors. A lot of the competition won’t allow for pairing with external sensors. A chest strap and foot pod compliment this nicely.CONS-Features. The feature list is a little weak (no GLONASS etc.) but as an entry level device that’s to be expected.- GPS. Not the fastest when getting a lock but you can spend that time humming Eye of the Tiger.- Music controls. Yes it has them but it’s basic.To summarize: This is a great entry-level device that ticks all the boxes if you’re a casual runner looking to get into a Garmin device.
If I were a runner who ran mostly outdoors, I would probably give the Garmin Forerunner 35 five stars, but I’m obliged to rate it instead according to its value to me, and even though I may not be the typical user, I can see no reason why better design decisions couldn’t, in most cases, made it just as useful to me. However, because, as a crackerjack programmer and software designer myself, my expectations for the functional designs of computer-based systems of others are quite low, so I was not unduly disappointed by my purchase.I expected at least, that the Garmin would provide me with an accurate GPS-based reading of time over distance for my infrequent outside workouts and races, and on that it delivers well – both with accurate readings, fast GPS acquisition, and so far no dropouts even though some one of my courses follows a winding road up a wooded mountain.Also, I didn’t necessarily suppose that I’d find much use or interest in the device as a fitness tracker, and that I wouldn’t want to wear it 24/7, but in that respect it provided me with a pleasant surprise. It’s small size, comfortable band, and highly legible readout without illumination, all make it desirable to wear just as a watch, and the HR and fitness tracking data are just gravy – interesting, if not always reliable (more on that below).I am, in fact, a competitive speed walker who mostly trains indoors on the treadmill, so I also purchased the Garmin footpad accessory in the hopes that it would help me to cross-calibrate the various treadmills I use with each other and with my actual speed, but in that respect the reported Forerunner + footpad results have been puzzling and unreliable. The functionality of the footpad, which laces into one’s shoes, is supposed to based on an accelerometer that provides an estimate of stride length, and in some way this is supposed to be further calibrated for accuracy by wearing the footpad while training outside with the GPS also enabled. I suppose that the GPS measures the distance, while the footpad accelerometer at least counts the number of strides over various sampled distances, and (if its program were sufficiently sophisticated) might be able to correlate variations in acceleration with particular over the ground speeds – but no documentation is provided by Garmin on the programming so one can only guess about this.Be that as it may, the actual speed/pace results the Garmin reports on training sessions of various treadmills where, as usual, I exercise at constant speeds for most of the session (anywhere from 40-120 minutes, typically), are far from the steady constant speed one presumes for the treadmills themselves. I do much of my training on my home treadmill, which is of pretty good quality, but I also go to the gym and use many of their expensive and robust treadmills, and the least I would expect from the Garmin is that it would report an even pace for the long stretches when the treadmill speed doesn’t vary. But that’s not what I get.in the first place, instead of an even constant pace line, I get a Garmin readout consisting exclusively of up and down spikes which bounce around the treadmill-reported pace by several % each way. That might be OK provided there was a way to derive the exact average for particular training stretches, but as it is the only thing I can do is to eyeball the graph and make a crude estimate of the average. The Garmin needs to smooth the data instead of reporting it as a series of inaccurate spikes.But that’s a minor problem compared to the other anomaly I’ve encountered in my constant pace sessions: the spiky Garmin-reported pace often sags across a session, with my average pace declining, say, from 5.2mph to 4.9mph, but then sometimes the pace seems to climb a gentle slope from lower to higher, and besides all that, there are occasional dropback spikes to much lower paces, even though I, and the treadmill belt, are just plugging along at one and the same pace throughout.Thus, one of the two main reasons I got this Garmin + footpad (total price well over $200), to give me a way of independently checking the reported speeds of the various treadmill speeds I use, has been frustrated, and neither customer service, nor the sketchy manual have been able to offer any cogent explanation for these anomalies.Given the extensive functionality claimed for this device as a tracker of fitness, goals, personal bests and stuff like that, there are a number of other problems with the Garmin Forerunner 35. For example, it has modes that are supposed to be customized for walkers as well as runners, both inside and outside (differentiating GPS based walking from inside footpad-measured walking) and there are also modes for biking and for “cardio” (whatever that is). Yet personal bests over various classic distances like the 5k, are only reported for running – which I don’t do – I’m a competitive speed walker or race walker, and am faster than many runners over the distances I do, yet my records don’t get registered.Calorie TrackingThe device undercounts calories for me both because it apparently treats the hundreds of stairs I climb each day as flat walking, and, more importantly, it undercounts the calories for the fast treadmill walking I do by from 5-15% compared to the online ExRX calculator (at https://www.exrx.net/Calculators/WalkRunMETs) which is based on American College of Sports Medicine data. And since the ExRx calculator also undercounts calories for the speeds I walk at (5mph and up), the Garmin undercounts by some 10-20%. For anyone else in my boat, who does speed walking or race walking, I suggest that they multiply the ExRx results by about 1.1 if their speeds are in the 5-5.5mph ranges. I’ve worked out this factor based on comparisons between the graphs for the running and race walking world records that the World Masters Athletics organization has come up with and built into their own WMA Age-Grading calculator (at http://www.howardgrubb.co.uk/athletics/wmalookup06.html) which also permits level playing field performance comparisons between people of different ages.Heart Rate TrackingWhen I get up after sitting for a while, walk down the hall and climb a set of stairs, or conversely, after moving around I trot downstairs then sit down and check my HR, I get counts that are highly volatile and way out of line both with the Polar FT7 HR monitor I train with, and for that matter with my measured pulse. Thus, doing the above might skyrocket my HR to 112 on the Forerunner display, which then settles down rapidly, say by 10 beats every few seconds until it gets back to my actual rate in the 60s, 50s, and 40s – all within the compass of 20-30 seconds. My actual HR virtually never gets above the high 80s after climbing the stairs, or the high 70s if I’m just walking down the hall. It appears that these wild fluctuations are somehow smoothed out and ignored in what the watch stores because they don’t leave such wild peaks in the 4 hour rolling HR report display or in the HR graph that displays when I upload the data. Why, then, doesn’t the dynamic watch display work the same way – smoothing out the data like my Polar FT7 does before reporting it in wild misleading swings? It appears that the same set of poor design decisions were made for HR reporting as for pace reporting.Sleep ReportingI’m not going to comment on the device’s differentiation between “deep sleep” and “light sleep” because these terms are nowhere defined in the sketchy inadequate manual, let alone related to the scientific sleep literature. I’ve read and thought a lot about sleep science but the Garmin provides me with nothing of value when it parses my sleep period into these two undefined categories, punctuated with occasional slivers of wakefulness, which don’t necessarily correspond with my actual state of consciousness. What does matter to me though, is my heart rate during sleep, because I have, all my long life as a distance athlete, used my resting pulse (RP) as an indicator of fitness, or the lack thereof, and as a warning sign of undue stress or overtraining. But the Garmin reporting of HR, and what it calls “average resting heart rate” (ARHR) has it’s own anomalies.For example, when I went to bed last night my ARHR was 45bpm. According to the graph of my HR for this sleep period (based on the uploaded data), my total sleep period was 6:30. During the first 4 minutes, my average pulse was about 48, and during the night there were five short spikes up into the 50s ranging from 1-4 minutes, and for some fraction of a minute my pulse reached 66. The first of the three times I got up to pee the Garmin showed that my ARHR had by that time dropped to 44, indicating that even though customer service told me that ARHR is an average over the last 7 sleep periods, my ARHR when I went to bed was close to 44 – which tracks with readings of the previous night, which also dropped intranight to 44.However, last night, except for those 4-5 brief intervals, which totaled about 10 minutes across the duration of my 6:30 sleep period, the graph of my HR shows a resting pulse that ranged from 34-44, with the average for the night being about 40. Yet at the end of my sleep period my ARHR had gone back up to 45!How did customer service explain this anomaly? Apparently the device ignores any resting pulses below 40 as artifacts, and since my RP was in the 30’s for about an hour and a half, and since this wasn’t even counted in averaging over the night (which gave more weight to the brief periods when my RP was in the high 40s and 50s) there was no drop in my ARHR, and in fact, over the last 6 months I’ve only briefly ever gotten it down to 44, even though my actual RP for the night is typically around 10-42, except on the nights after intense training sessions.Despite these evident software design flaws, my overall impression of Garmin, and even of the Forerunner 35, is positive. Customer service is good to excellent, with actual Americans at the other end (instead of Indians or Filipinos working from a script), who are at least familiar with the workings of the devices they are supporting. And because English is their native language they are at least able to understand the more probing questions I ask about how the device was actually programmed to work, though they are seldom able to come up with the answers on their own. But then even their supervisors or the experts they go away and consult with are apparently in the dark about how the device is programmed, and as is to be expected these days of minimal American literacy the manual is barely adequate as a guide to the operation of the device, and quite inadequate to explain the meaning of the various readouts, which renders the whole thing of dubious value once you venture beyond the bounds of its core functionality – i.e. GPS tracking of time over distance.
When I saw that this watch was being released, I read up on it and purchased it an hour later from an authorized Garmin retailer on Amazon, receiving it the next day. A little backstory…I used a GShock for years and loved it. I graduated to my first smart watch with the original Apple Watch. I had a love/hate relationship with it needing to be charged daily, the always-off screen, overall slowness, to name a few annoyances. It was just really cool all the “things” it could do.I left it for a Pebble 2 and really loved that watch for about 18 months until the buttons crumbled. I started using a backup Pebble 2 but I knew these watches had a very short lifespan. I tried a Ticwatch and an Amazfit Bip. Both were dreadfully disappointing so I went to an Apple Watch Series 3. It was more of the original Apple Watch but faster and a more mature operating system. I just recently upgraded again to the Apple Watch Series 4, which was again more of the same thing but a faster iteration. Still the always-off screen and needing daily charging made me miss my Pebble more and more.Then the Instinct just “checked all the boxes” for me. Back when my Pebble fell apart, this was the list I made in order of importance for my ideal smart watch:Always-on display:Instinct ✓ (monochrome, sunlight-visible, transflective memory-in-pixel, with backlight)Several day battery life:Instinct ✓ (14 days)Physical buttons:Instinct ✓ (5, and you can program each for long-hold shortcuts)Waterproof:Instinct ✓ (100m)Notifications:Instinct ✓Music controls:Instinct ✓Text reply by voice:Instinct xCalendar:Instinct ✓Weather:Instinct ✓I realized that all the cool “things” I do on my Apple Watch are silly and can be replicated on my iPhone. I don’t need to scribble a text reply on my watch or use it as a glorified speakerphone. I miss the core functionality of a reliable watch that doesn’t need frequent charging, has an always-on screen, and physical button controls, especially when it comes to music or podcast controls without having to look or wake the screen. The fact that the Instinct has 24/7 heart rate tracking, GPS, and is built like a beast are nice bonuses. I don’t expect this watch to fall apart as easily as a Pebble, not to mention it actually has a warranty. (Constructed to U.S. military standard 810G for thermal, shock and water resistance).After a weekend with the Garmin Instinct:I use the watch primarily as a rugged smart watch. I have two kids that are always climbing over me or having me chase afer them. I rely on notifications and music controls in a device that I can just put on my wrist and forget about it for days without charging. When I look at the device, I need it to always show me the time. I can’t deal with having to wake the device, so this type of display is more my style. I walk 2 miles about 2-3 times per week, and like to keep an eye on my lap time and heart rate, and control a podcast during that walk. I’ll focus mostly on the differences between this watch and the Pebble 2, with some comparisions to the Apple Watch sprinkled in, as that’s the watch I switched to after the buttons on my Pebble 2 crumbled.The display:It sure was nice going back to an always-on screen, being able to glance at it whenever I needed to see the time or an alert, especially from being used to an Apple Watch for months. I felt like I was getting carpel tunnel syndrome from forcibly having to turn the Apple Watch towards me to wake it. It was easy to read from basically any angle or lighting. I had no trouble whatsoever reading it while outdoors, in direct sunlight. Indoors, I didn’t the Instinct’s backlight unless the room was completely without lighting, such as in bed. However, the Pebble 2 is still more crisp, with a better contrast. Silly of me, but I did install a rounded 31mm screen protector just in case, which fit the 32mm screen perfectly. I found a 5-pack on Amazon for roughly $6. I like to protect the screens of all of my devices, and since this isn’t a sapphire display, I’d like to keep the screen looking new. If you see an “edge” on the display in my photos, that’s the edge of the screen protector and not the watch’s actual display.The battery:Granted, I only used it for 2 days and the battery is rated for 14 days, it was already nice not having to charge the device yet, whereas the Apple Watch would have gone through two charge cycles by now. I would charge the Apple Watch while I slept, whereas I now wear the Instinct to bed where it tracks my sleep automatically. I went through all the settings, tested different options, etc. on the watch for a good two days, so after messing with it a lot more than I normally would, after 2 days the battery now reads 4 of 5 bars. Extrapolate that, and it’s roughly 10 days of a lot of fiddling with the device. With average use, I could see 12-14 days easily. My Pebble 2 lasted a good 7 days before having to charge, so hopefully getting close to double that would be great.Physical buttons:Again, something nice to come back to was the ability to control the watch 100% with physical buttons. The 5 buttons are easy to press, and have a satisfying click. You know when you’ve pressed a button, even without looking. They’re not mushy at all compared to my Pebble 2, which had some of the worst buttons on any device I’ve used this century. The Pebble 2’s buttons were mushy, lopsided, and change the resistance over time, until which they just crumble and fall apart. The Apple Watch is a completely different device, controlled primarily with the touch screen, or the crown and side button (or voice). I don’t miss these aspects of the Apple Watch at all.The menus in this watch go quite deep. There are so many features, especially with workouts. It took me some time to get used to the buttons and their function, but it’s not something that should prevent you from trying the device. I just wish the app would mirror all of the menus in the watch, so I could manage the buttons more from my phone.Waterproof:I’ve not yet tested this feature of the device, although it is rated to 100 meters.Notifications:I was pleasantly surprised with how well this worked when paired to my iPhone 7 Plus. Notifications mirrored from my phone without any issues. The notifications timeout can be set to 30 seconds, 1 minute, or 3 minutes. During the initial notification timeout period, you can 1-click the “down” button to clear that notification (more on clearing notifications below). I was able to see a large portion of text messages and other notifications, although it is truncated when it initially appears on the display. I can go into the notification and scroll through more of the text, but there does seem to be a character limit, before I need to pick up my iPhone and see more information. For being notified of something that needs my attention, it does a great job, just as well as my Pebble 2 did. When a phone call came in, I was able to see the caller’s name, and had the ability to answer or decline. An answered phone call would simply answer from my iphone as there is no speaker/microphone on the Instinct. An Apple Watch had better notification support, simply because I could act on them, but again that is not something I miss.What surprised me was that clearing a notification on my watch also cleared that notification on my iPhone, and vice versa – clearing a notification from my iPhone also cleared it from the Instinct’s notification list. This is something that did not exist on my Pebble 2. In comparison, the Pebble 2 was a list of dumb notifications. If I cleared a notification on my Pebble 2, it remained in the notification center on my iPhone. Or if I cleared a notification on my iPhone, it remained in the list of notifications on my Pebble 2. The Instinct’s manual describes this as “smart notifications” and I believe that to be true.However, while I can clear notifications from the Instinct, I can only clear them one at a time. I can’t find a way to clear all notifications at once from the Instinct. To do that, it’s quicker to just do it on the iPhone. I’ve reached out to Garmin to see if this is a possibility.Another aspect of the smart notifications, is the ability to notify you with tone or vibration, or both tone and vibration. You can go a bit more granular and decide how you’re notified during a workout/activity compared to not during a workout activity. For example, I have “tone” notifications for when I’m not in a workout, and “tone & vibration” for when I’m in a workout. The vibration is rather strong and I would prefer if I could make it less intense, otherwise I would leave both tone & vibration on all the time.Music controls:The music/podcast controls work as well as my Pebble 2. You can pause/play, change volume, go to previous/next track, enable/disable repeat, or enable/disable shuffle. However, one downside of the music/podcast controls is that the current time does not display on the screen while at the music/podcast controls. This means I have to press two buttons to get back to the watch face to see the the time. This is something that Garmin can likely update through software updates, and something I would really appeciate.I noticed that the time of the song/podcast would sometimes display as —:— instead of the actual time progressed, but I haven’t used it enough to see why or how frequently it will really happen.Text reply:On iOS, you can’t interact with notifications, with the exception of answering/declining a phone call. This is a limitiation with iOS. I believe there is more functionality if you were to use an Android phone. My Pebble 2 used to have replies, but with the shutdown of the servers, that’s a thing of the past. There is some functionality with Rebble (the service that tried to resurrect Pebble’s services), but again I believe that’s more developed from an Android phone. For notifications that actually need a response or interaction, I just pick up my phone. I don’t really miss the ability to do this from my wrist as it’s still faster to just do it from my iPhone.Calendar:Surprisingly, the calendar is quite similar to Pebble’s “timeline”, with the exception that the Instinct’s calendar only goes 1 day into the future and 0 days in the past, whereas the Pebble 2 let me go 3 days in the future and 1 day into the past. The Instinct allowed me to view the time, location, and description of the events, although they got truncated just like notifications.Weather:I’m not sure of the data source, but I have read online that they use Accuweather. It appears accurate when compared to other weather sources, and quickly shows me the current weather, high/low for the day, weather condition symbol, percentage change of precipitation today, and wind speed and direction – all on one screen. I have the weather in my widgets carousel (more on that below), which means it’s always 1 button click away from my watch face.Other thoughts – heart monitor:I very briefly had a Pebble 2 HR and while it did have a heart monitor, I felt it was wildly inaccurate. The Pebble 2 HR also had a large bump on the rear of the device, which made the entire watch sit higher on my wrist. The Apple Watch did have what seemed like an accurate heart monitor, but it wasn’t continuous. It would only take a reading every few minutes, sometimes not for 15 minutes or so. The heart rate monitor on the Instinct is rated as “24/7 continuous”, and it definitely is. I have the heart rate monitor on my watch face and it updates every single second. It also has a small chart of the previous 4 hours.I haven’t yet gone for my 2 mile walk, and I plan to update my comments when I’ve done so, but this is where Garmin devices typically excel and I don’t expect to have any issues. You can customize the metrics that display for each workout, and it gets extremely granular for people who want to zero-in on exactly what they’re looking for in a workout. This is a serious fitness device, but I really just want to keep an eye on my current pace, total distance, time elapsed, and the current time. I also want to be able to quickly pause/unpause my podcast and raise/lower the volume occasionally.Other thoughts – watch faces:There are 12 watch faces, but really only 6 since half of them are inversed colors of the other 6. Each watch face allows you to customize the complications. I use the default watch face, which allows for the time with seconds (although there’s no PM/AM indicator), and 4 complications. I have: heart rate, day of week with date number, number of uncleared notifications, and battery level. Holding the MENU button brings up the watch menu, and the battery mater is displayed there, so I may wind up using that complication area for something else, especially considering how long teh battery should last.There is no Garmin Connect IQ on this watch, and I consider that to be a good thing. While it would allow you to install apps and additional watch faces, along with that comes the possibility of bugs draining your battery or introducing instability. I found that I never used many apps on my Pebble 2 or even the Apple Watch. Having my watch primarily be an actual watch is of great importance to me.Other thoughts – widgets carousel:From the watch face, you can press up/down to cycle through your widgets. Available widgets include: notifications, calendar, heart rate, music controls, weather, last sport, last run, last ride, last swim, steps, floors climbed, my day, calories, intensity minutes, stress, abc, altimeter, barometer, compass, temperature, dogtrack, virb, inreach, alternate time zones, xero, and sunrise/sunset. You can set as many or as few as you want, and can order them however you want as well. I have these enabled: notifications, calendar, heart rate, music controls, weather – so one press UP from my watch face brings me to the weather, or one press DOWN from my watch face brings me to my notifications, and they cycle through if you were to continually press UP or DOWN.Other thoughts – hotkeys/shortcuts:In addition to the widgets carousel, you can also customize hotkeys. A hotkey allows you to hold a button for 2 seconds to quickly jump to a destination. These are all the possible shortcuts which can be customized to a limited amount of destinations:Hold GPS buttonHold Back buttonHold Down buttonHold GPS + Down buttonsHold GPS + Up buttonsHold Back + Light buttonsHold Back + Up buttonsThe available Hotkey destinations are: GPS, timers, stopwatch, phone, dual grid, mob, lock/unlock keys, widgets, lap, navigation, backlight, metronome, sight ‘n go, screenshot, controls, baro. watch mode, sync time, flashlight, alarm clock, abc, set, broadcast HR, or disable the hotkey entirely.Holding the “Light” button can’t be customized as it takes you to the controls carousel.Holding the “Up” button can’t be customized as it takes you to the Menu.Right now I have the Down button as a hotkey to jump to my alarms, the back key to jump to timers, and the Back + Light combination to trigger the “flashlight”, which is just the screen brightness set to 100%, but is enough to get you through a dark room.Other thoughts – alarms:The alarms have the option to make tone, vibrate, or both tone & vibrate, as well as custom repeat days of the week. They can be set from the watch directly or through the Garmin app. It woke me without any problem as I had both the tone & vibrate enabled, but just the vibrate would likely wake me up – and possibily even a deep sleeper. Considering I should only have to charge every couple of weeks, this means I can sleep with it on every night and its going to become my daily alarm.Other thoughts – stopwatch:The stopwatch is almost unusable for me, since it (1) doesn’t display the current time and (2) doesn’t allow you to leave the screen while the stopwatch is being run. The time screen shows me the current time and allows me to leave the screen while the timer is in process, so I don’t understand why the stopwatch has this limitation.Other thoughts – bluetooth connectivity:My Apple Watch would fall back to Wifi if out of range of bluetooth, so it was nice to walk around my entire house without having to keep the phone in range, but the Garmin Instinct only has bluetooth connectivity to your phone. That connectivity was often hit or miss on my Apple Watch, as it would sometimes think it was connected by bluetooth, but if I attempted to send a message when I wasn’t actually within range, it would forever get stuck and I’d have to disable/enable iMessage.I found the bluetooth range on the Garmin Instinct to be similar to that of my Pebble 2. It was interesting that if you enable “phone – alerts” on the Instinct, among other things it will notify you when your iPhone’s battery is low, but also if you go out of bluetooth range – then again notify you when you return to bluetooth range and the device reconnects. If you have the “notification” complication on your watch, you will also know if you’re in/out of range by seeing the number of notifications change to “–” when out of bluetooth coverage. This connect/disconnect feature was available on my Pebble 2 through certain watch faces or 3rd party apps, but it comes right out of the box with the Instinct.Final thoughts:It’s only been a couple days now, but I’ve already put my Apple Watch Series 4 up for sale, and haven’t looked back at my Pebble 2. I believe this is as close as I’ll get to the core functionality of a smart watch that I miss with the Pebble 2. That being said, this watch can stand on its own and not just be a fill-in or replacement of the Pebble 2. The Garmin Instinct has a great operating system, seems very reliable in terms of notifications and alarms, not to mention it feels like I could drive over this watch with a tank and it’ll keep on working. The app offers some nice insight into all of my health statistics, but I get enough interaction directly from the watch and am not sure how useful the app will be to me – although I definitely appreciate being able to customize some options directly from within the app.I got the Instinct in graphite color, which isn’t entirely black but is more of a shadow/grey and is really nice looking. The bands are easy to swap, but I’m going to stick with the one that came with the watch.One other nice thing about this watch is that it can act completely independent from a phone/app. You just obviously wouldn’t get any of the smart features such as notifications, calendar, weather, etc. The heart rate sensor will still work and activities will still be tracked. The time can even be set and updated directly from built-in GPS, without having to rely on a phone. This is not something that can be said of a Pebble 2 or even an Apple Watch. If you want to buy this watch as a super rugged G-shock type of watch but with great heart rate and activity monitoring, with the option of one day going completely independent of a phone or app, this is also a great choice.DAY 4 updates:Music controls update: Note that the Pebble 2 had “dedicated” button controls while at the music control screen. Push down for next track, up for previous, or middle to bring up options to change the volume up/down. Or holding up increased volume or holding down decreased volume, or holding middle paused/unpaused. However, with the Instinct, only one “action” is currently enabled. For example, the pause/play button is highlighted so that is the active function. If you want to change the volume, you have to turn the carousel to get to the specific control, then that action would be the one in control of the button. It’s difficult to explain, but results in more button presses to do what you want with your music.Weather update: I realized that while at the weather widget, you can press the GPS button (or “enter” button as you’ll come to realize), that this brings you into a forecast for the next 4 hours. Then press “down” and you’ll see the daily forecast for the next 4 hours. During both of these forecast screens, the “now” temperature remains in the upper-right screen.Watch Face update: I realized that I was wasting a spot in the upper-right complication by showing the date there, because I could move that to the bottom of the screen where I had the battery. Then in the upper right, I can add a 4-in-1 complication that shows: battery, phone connection, alarm status, and do not disturb status.Stopwatch update: Somebody pointed out that you can hold the “CTRL” button to jump out of the stopwatch, then back out to the watch face. All the while, the stopwatch is still running. You can then go back to the stopwatch as normal, or go to your controls carousel to see the elapsed time on the stopwatch. Still, I would prefer to remain at the stopwatch screen and see the time so I don’t have to jump out like this.Final thoughts update: I realized that I didn’t even bother to comment on the band comfort, and I think that’s because it’s so comfortable that I hardly noticed it. There are many adjustment points on the band and it’s an incredibly soft & matte silicone material. I find that I like keeping the watch on the 13th hole from (counting from the watch body), but I loosen it to the 14th hole before bedtime. I haven’t noticed any difference in the accuracy of the heart rate monitor between wearing it on the 13th or 14th hole.
I was looking for a GPS watch and it was a toss up between this, the Garmin Fenix 5 or the Suunto Traverse. I chose this due to the price and some of the great reviews it’s been receiving on YouTube. I think I made the right choice. Imagine the Garmin Fenix with all the flashy bits stripped back and just the essential functions left in.This is a product that does most things really well and some things pretty badly. The things it does well are the elements that revolve around hiking and walking outdoors. It has some advanced features that are genuinely helpful when out on the trail or up a mountain.GPS Functionality-Amazingly this watch has virtually replaced my handheld GPS device. Even though it doesn’t have maps, the route can be clearly seen on the screen in bright sunlight or dark cloud and you will feel a buzz as soon as you veer off course. The arrow will point you in the right direction and you will feel a buzz as soon as you’re back on course. We are only talking less than 10meters off course, so it’s really accurate. Furthermore when you are following a route you get lots of very important and life-saving information, like End of route ETA and sunset time. Essential when hiking in winter. The only time I’ve had to refer back to my handheld is when a route double backs on itself, as it can be confusing to work out on the watch. I recommend planning routes using OS MAPS amazing mobile or online apps and then imported into Garmin Basecamp. Avoid Garmin’s Explore app as it’s glitchy and sadly lacking in functionality.Sensors -Most of the information the watch gives you from the sensors seems accurate apart from the step count. Altitude, barometer, temperature all seem okay.User interface and experience-If you like flashy graphics then you’ll be disappointed, but if you like simplicity and functionality then the user interface is perfect. It’s easy to work with and the fact that the watch has buttons means you can navigate through the functions with gloves on, which is a huge advantage over a touchscreen. The watch itself is very light so you forget you’re even wearing it most of the time.Battery lifeThe battery life is good. If you just use it as a watch it’ll go a week or two without needing a charge. With the GPS on expect the watch to last a day of hiking, charging is also very fast, so even if it runs out of juice you can easily replenish using a small power pack when taking a coffee break.Now for the negatives…Most of the negatives surround Garmin’s software which is why I have given this watch 3 stars. Garmin really needs to simplify and update their accompanying software for their devices as the whole ecosystem is a mess.For the instinct you have 3 pieces of software, yes 3 that you need to get your head around if you want to use the watch to it’s full potential. Furthermore the mapping apps -Explore and Basecamp are just awful and take a lot of trial and error before you can be sure to trust that your watch has the correct maps loaded and they actually work.Garmin’s accompanying Explore App is sadly missing some essential features that Hikers tend to rely upon, namely GPX import/export and the ability to send your planned routes to friends and family via text or email. The app is also be a bit glitchy, I’ve spent ages planning routes only to find that they can’t sync with the watch so I tend to use Garmin’s antiquated Basecamp app on the PC as it’s more reliable and has all the functionality I need, but it looks and feels like it was designed in the 1990’s.Sadly Garmin don’t seem to want to deal with the sorry state of their Apps so that significantly lowers the score on this watch as there are apps for the Apple Watch like WorkOutDoors that actually works so much better than anything Garmin have. That’s crazy considering Garmin manufacture hardware.Tracks not RoutesGarmin has 3 ways of creating and saving routes – You have a ‘track’ and a ‘route’, you also have an ‘Activity’ this is really confusing and compounded by the fact that the Instinct watch can handle tracks but not routes, though it won’t tell you until you get to your hole location and the watch just doesn’t load your Map/Course/Activity/track (whatever they want to call it) This is infuriating as there really is no explanation as to why there is a difference and sometimes their own software gets confused and makes a total mess of things when you try to work with routes. My advice, just work with tracks, not routes. Garmin are seriously letting their product down by producing such bad software.Final verdict -Now I’ve lived with the watch for few months and I’ve worked out how to use the apps and software, I can honestly say that it has become an essential piece of hiking kit. I wear it every day and really enjoy owning and using it.
I’ve waited for five months before writing a review on the Garmin Forerunner 45. I wanted to be sure of my views and that confidence could only emerge with repeated usage over time. Hence, after about more or less 500kms of running in the past five months, I am confident of my review accuracy.So I wanted a fitness watch, solely to monitor my runs, walks and physical activity. It took me some time but I homed on to the Forerunner 45 considering both my budget and specific purpose.The Forerunner 45 is not a smart watch with versatility and functions of the Apple Watch but it performs some useful smart functions of alerting you once a call or message is received. Leave that aside as my purpose was not a full-scale smart watch but a physical fitness smart watch.And I could not have been happier. The Forerunner 45 is beautifully crafted and ergonomically designed. I have a thin wrist and the watch size was perfect for me. I find it fits snugly and the watch band has excellent grip and sturdy latching mechanism.It is very accurate. I matched the iPhone measurements and based on my previous measured runs I found the watch to be consistent and correct in measurements. Plus, it’s a Garmin product, they produce GPS receivers that are fitted on aircraft and ships the world over. So accuracy is assured.Battery life is very good, I need to charge it every third day or preferably the second day, and the charging takes little time. I think about 30 minutes or so to full charge from half charge status. In all probability, if you don’t use the GPS, the battery life will be a week. The point is battery life is very good and charges fast.The push buttons for accessing the menu are intuitive and I never felt the need for a touch screen functionality. When your fingers are sweaty and you are doused in sweat, you need hard interfaces and the push buttons are ideal. At least I feel so. The menu navigation takes a little time to get used to but it’s not a worry at all. Be a little patient in the initial stages to learn the settings. There is some complexity in settings such as alerts every km or units or targets etc. I wonder how much of these can one gainfully use, but there are a number of user settings that can be done. I like the feature that when it’s dark and you are exercising, the dial lights up when the wrist is turned to your face for you to see the exercise status, and then switches off on its own. That saves battery too. Good engineering.Yes, you may have read that the GPS lock on takes some time and I too have noted that occasionally. But off late, after upgrading the software, I have not noticed any delay in locking on to the GPS. It takes less than a minute but I have had occasions that the lock on has taken up to 15 minutes. In a way, a few minutes to achieve lock on is good as I warm up and stretch during that time. So if it takes a little while, I am fine with it. But please ensure that you upgrade the software upon release of a new version. This should happen automatically on syncing the watch with the Garmin App on the phone.The mobile app is well designed and syncs well with the watch. The details of your walk, run, duration of exercises, VO2, calories, sleep activity are all updated and aggregated. For instance, it’s a good feeling to see the amount you’ve walked or run in a week or a month or a full year. And you do get motivated to exercise more if the data shows a declining trend. Your best effort is also highlighted from time to time. In all, the Garmin app is neat, well designed and presents the data in great detail. For example, you can access additional details of your run, your heart rate, body battery and also stress level. You can compare yourself with the rest of the population that is using Garmin app. Frankly, I have not accessed in great detail the data measured by the Watch, its quite a lot. But the watch is very sensitive. I was once running and a wire from a tree was hanging loose, I ran into it unknowingly and it stabbed me on my cheek bone…I stopped dead on my track and the watch started to vibrate wildly exclaiming a sudden stop and then went on to dial the emergency number. I was amazed. This could have actually been an emergency if the wire has impacted my eye. Hence, the watch is very sensitive to alert any fall or sudden stop. I can vouch for that.So for QUALITY, BUILD, ACCURACY, APP SUPPORT and BATTERY…the Forerunner 45 is a great fitness watch.
Esta es mi opinión acerca del dispositivo:Diseño: No dispone de ningún material de lujo, pero el plástico lo hace sentir ligero y preguntando a varias personas de mi entorno, lo ven bonito, he probado su resistencia dentro de una piscina, y todo correcto.Procesador: Creo que el apartado más destacado del reloj, se nota rápido, ligero y todo responde bien.Batería: Con mi uso (hice los test, realizando un par de llamadas de 5 minutos, con el brillo a nivel medio, leyendo notificaciones y con las opciones de registros de oxígeno y pulso activados), con esa configuración la batería se comportó de la siguiente manera:DÍA 1 9:00 = 100:00 = 75%DÍA 29:00 = 27 :25 = 0 %Software: Aquí sensaciones diferentes, las opciones del reloj predeterminadas funcionan bien, en gran parte gracias al procesador, por otra parte, falta solucionar varias traducciones tanto de la app como algunas opciones del reloj (como en el tiempo), también noté ciertos errores en la implementación del asistente de Google, comentar que durante mis pruebas se me actualizó un par de veces, así que parece que le están dando soporte.Pantalla: Aquí tenía un prejuicio claro, al no ser amoled pensaba que se vería mal, pero no es así ,la pantalla tiene calidad y se ve bien a pleno sol (he puesto una foto de ejemplo), está claro que hubiera sido un plus tener pantalla amoled y brillo automático, aún así , satisfecho con este apartado.Opinión Global: Creo que es un buen dispositivo, claro está que hubiera rozado la perfección con una pantalla amoled , brillo automático y unos materiales más premium, pero me he sentido cómodo con el dispositivo y creo que si van mejorando algo el software es una compra recomendableThis is my opinion about the device:Design: It doesn’t have any luxury material, but the plastic makes it feel light and asking several people around me, they see it nice, I have tested its resistance inside a pool, and all correct.Processor: I think the most outstanding section of the watch, it feels fast, light and everything responds well.Battery: With my use (I did the tests, making a couple of 5 minute calls, with the brightness at medium level, reading notifications and with the options of oxygen and pulse records activated), with that configuration the battery behaved as follows:DAY 1 9:00 = 100:00 = 75Y 29:00 = 27 :25 = 0 %Software: Here different sensations, the default clock options work well, largely thanks to the processor, on the other hand, lacking to solve several translations of both the app and some clock options (as in time), I also noticed certain errors in the implementation of the Google assistant, comment that during my tests the watch was updated a couple of times, so it seems that they are giving support.Display: Here I had a clear prejudice, not being amoled I thought it would look bad, but it is not so ,the screen has quality and looks good in full sun (I have put an example photo), it is clear that it would have been a plus to have amoled screen and automatic brightness, still , satisfied with this section.Overall Opinion: I think it is a good device, it is clear that it would have bordered on perfection with an amoled screen, automatic brightness and more premium materials, but I felt comfortable with the device and I think if they are improving something the software is a recommended purchase.
So I have a few smart watches. This is my 3rd WearOS watch. I had the original Huawei Watch, a mobvoi Ticwatch S2, and a Gen 4 Fossil Smart Watch. I also have a Garmin Instinct. Generally all of these watches have been compromises. The Huawei watch was built on a processor that quickly was forgotten and didn’t get updates, but it was a very nice looking watch. The Mobvoi Ticwattch S2 had great durability but lacked a few features I wanted (NFC for payments for one) and was a little under-powered. The Gen 4 Fossil was nice looking and had 1GB of ram making it run a little smoother, but the processor was still kind of slow and it lacked an spO2 sensor (I have sleep apnea and am curious about that). Additionally due to weight some things with its design the Fossil Watch wasn’t great for working out. (Doing push-ups, your going to hit those buttons a lot.) Another problem with all of these Wear OS watches is battery life. They all need daily charging given my use. My Garmin instinct needs to be charged every 2 weeks or so, but it doesn’t have nearly the smart features (no NFC, no Assistant, no on the flay responses to notifications though there are preset quick replies for text).That brings us to this watch, The Mobvoi Ticwatch E3. This watch is essentially an update to my S2 which can be seen in the pictures beside the E3 (the E2 and S2 were basically the same watch with different casings). It has more RAM and the newest processor and it shows. This watch is smooth, quickly responds to Assistant request. This is only the second watch with this new processor and the other, the Mobvoi Tickwatch Pro3, is a $300 watch.It also has an improved screen, which can get brighter and looks great….aside from the bezel. On the S2 the design was a sportier watch design that while it had a chunky kind of bezel surround it made the screen actually all screen. The E3 has a large black ring around the watch face. I use watch faces with black backgrounds and it doesn’t bother me much, but it may be something that others won’t like the look of. This watch has 2 nice side pushers instead of the flat button on the S2. They are nice, but I haven’t worked out with them yet to see if they will cause a problem. On my fossil watch it did seem like I mostly hit the center button on accident, so maybe these two offset buttons will be better. The Fossil watch has a rotating crown, which is a very nice way to navigate the system, this doesn’t have that feature and I do miss it a little.Battery life is only slightly better that my other Wear OS watches. I get to the end of the day with about 25% and charge it before bed. It takes a little longer to charge (about 1 hour to go from 25%-100%) and uses a charger that connects a little awkwardly at the top next to the strap (see photo). It is important to note that my use is a lot for smart watches. I get nearly all my notifications set, I keep an always on (but dimmed) display because I like to be able to just see the time and for my watch to look like a watch. I do turn off lift to wake and touch to wake so I have to actually push the button to get the watch to full brightness. I use all day heart and on this watch spO2 monitoring. At night in bed, I turn on theater mode to turn off the screen completely. Tweaking these settings may get you longer battery life. In the 7 days I have had the watch I have run down to under 5% once. Then the watch enters an “essentials mode”. It will continue to tell time, track steps, and a few other things for days in that mode as I understand it. The more expensive Ticwatch Pro 3 has a second low power LCD screen over the color screen you can use as your always on screen to really expand battery life, but that watch is $300. The essentials mode on this watch is similar to the on the pro 3, but without the low power screen. Battery life on this watch is a little better than other Wear OS watches, for me that is just over a day, your mileage may vary.Design wise, I wish Mobvoi had made an S3, as I am a little concerned I may scratch this watch’s screen. The S2 had a recessed screen that felt a little better protected. Aside from that, this watch looks nice and is very light weight due to plastic build. I am fine with the plastic build, because it saves weight on what would be a heavy thick watch if it was a metal build This is the fastest, smoothest, best working Wear OS watch I have had. It may not be the nicest looking (that would be the fossil) but it works the best. And it does still look nice. The curved screen is good looking and feels good under the finger.I will say I have one worry about this watch, that is OS updates. My S2, which is just over a year old, has not had an OS update in a while, and the new version running on this new watch would be great on my S2. The updated tiles and app tray in the current version of wear OS is nice. Additionally Google and Samsung have announced they are working together to make Wear OS’s next update, due likely near the end of this summer. So far Mobvoi has not announced that it will update this watch to the updated version of the OS, which makes me worry that my new watch could be outdated in just two months. It will continue to work, but over time apps and things will quickly not be supported.So this watch is a great watch, the only other wear OS watch that matches it’s computing hardware is $100 more expensive (most of the time, it can be found on sale sometimes). This watch runs great and has all of the features I can think you might want. The battery life is a little better than older Wear OS watches, but it will likely still be a daily charger for most. It looks good, it light and comfortable to wear, and can be set bright enough to see in the sun. It’s a really good watch for the money.
battery lasted one use; will need to plan for charging after each use but not a problem for me as i only use it for running/biking, not full time wear. it’s a bit large but i think it’s meant for men (I’m a woman) and it was the most basic, affordable one i could find. overall, just what i need for the price
What do I like about the TicWatch Pro 3 Ultra?Hardware and design. My last TicWatch was a Pro2020 felt like a “pro” watch and that continues here with the Pro 3 Ultra. Mobvoi put together a case made of stainless steel and “high-strength nylon with fiberglass” to give it toughness and a premium feel. Unlike my TicWatch Pro 2020, or my Fossil The Fossil felt quite cheap and gross on the wrist, the Pro 3 Ultra is not going to be mistaken for anything but a high-end smartwatch.It’s a familiar design, with two pushers and a subtle change to the bezel that help differentiate it from my 2020 Pro. It is large as hell (47mm x 48mm), People say it fit on smaller wrists, but something about how it sits on my smallish wrist doesn’t offend me. I’ve worn the Ultra for 6 days now and while I haven’t ignored the size, it hasn’t bothered me. The weight, at 41g, is on the higher end as well, but again, it’s not so heavy that it’ll impact your mobility or anything.The pushers have a purposeful click to them without any wiggle or cheapness. There are not rotating crowns or buttons, although always found that these rotating features on other watches were clunky when you have your hands full. Which seems like I always have both of my hands full. watch to read my messages Check my Calendar or look up something on the net. IE what spark plug do I use for this Snowblower. The 22mm included band is quite thick I think I like the leather look band on my Pro 2020 but it’s a well-made rubber strap. You could really put this through it all and I’d imagine this band will hold up to some abuse. Of course, you can quick swap it with any other 22mm band you may prefer.Overall, the TicWatch Pro 3 Ultra looks like a premium smartwatch that can take on an adventure yet dress up if you need it to. And yeah, I’ve worn it for workouts I work at a Hardware store so I can tell you it has taken a beating with no signs of damage. I wear daily with normal clothes or dressed up for date nights and it wears just fine. You can change the face to any of hundreds of faces dressy or fun faces in seconds.Performance. As I just mentioned above, the TicWatch Pro 3 Ultra runs the Snapdragon Wear 4100 with dual processor system. I can tell you what would take minutes with my Pro 2020 takes seconds now.I can tell you is that this watch performs solidly. After initial setup, I have zero complaints about opening apps, installing updates, jumping between notifications and ongoing activities, using GPS, activating gestures, etc. This watch is certainly taking advantage the dual processor and 1 Gig of Ram and 8 gigs of Rom.Again, it’s a 4100, which we know is capable, it is miles ahead of all those Snapdragon Wear 2100 and 3100 watches. It is faster and then the Pro 2020 I just know that the watch is a pleasure to use.Battery life. Mobvoi once again tossed a 577mAh battery into a watch The577mAh battery is big enough that it’ll get you through 4 days of heavy use. That’s what I’m saying, and I have not tried to save any battery by limiting settings I turned on every sensor and turned on every permission.My setup has been, always-on display on, and all the health tracking activated, like continuous heartrate monitoring, sleep tracking, SpO2 tracking, and their new mental fatigue/energy level measuring feature. It’s all on.Back to battery. I’ve been wearing the Pro 3 Ultra for almost 6 full days and I’ve charged it 0nce. That’s pretty good! The first charge lasted a full 72hours (14% battery remaining) and included sleep tracking, always-on display, and an 8 hour of workout tracking. The 2nd charge sat at 54% after 36 hours or so with Maps tracking my 30 minutes of hike, a 30 min driving directions home.If you were to use the dual display, turn off a couple of fitness features, and not use the GPS every day, I could see this watch coming close to the suggested 7 days hours of use. This battery is so big.The app Menu is amazing it provides you two rows of aps so no endless scrolling to find the app you want. Dump the Wear-OS apps for fitness and use the Tic apps supplied they are well thought out.It will fully breakdown your sleep and the stages you were in before giving you a score the following morning. It has GPS, which I found to be very accurate. It’ll track your 24-7 heartrate and warn you if things look off, keep a running SpO2 score, remind you to move throughout the day, and (now) try to tell you if you are mentally fatigued and how your energy level is. I wanted to thank you for allowing me to test the Ticwatch Pro Ultra 3 it has been an amazing experience like I said in my review. The battery life is awesome. Even walking on average 5-20 miles a day at work I only have to charge it about every 3 to 5 days. Obviously I am in decent shape my wife and I like to hike and horseback ride canoe on weekends. I have had a pacemaker since I was 19. That being said last December I had my Pacemaker replaced. Because of the pandemic I had to wait close to 5 days before they could get it replaced. During this time the pacemaker was on low power mode which means it was only pacing half of my heart. This was unnerving to say the least. The only thing that kept me confidant of my heart was my Ticwatch Pro Ultra. It kept me confidant that my heart rate didn’t drop to low, and my blood oxygen level was still in the 90 percent range. Then in June I had Covid and as My lungs filled with fluid, I had the same self-assurance that I was healthy. So once again thank you making the TicWatch Pro Ultra 3 not only is it a great watch with an awesome battery that tracks my adventures but it also helps give me peace of mind when I am not at my top health.
How do we know how much we love someone or something? By how much/how little we rejoice when being reunited. Back in August 21′, my Garmin Forerunner 230–my second watch of that model–broke when I slipped on a pothole during a long distance run in Jerusalem. Because I wear the face of the watch on the under wrist, it broke while I was breaking my fall. I loved this watch, even though it was an older model that had been phased out of production, and I purchased both it and the previous unit as “refurbished” watches on Amazon. I wore this watch in tandem with a Garmin chest strap to get the most accurate heart rate reading I could during these long runs. When the watch broke, I didn’t bother ordering a new one, as I was overseas and preferred to wait until I would be back home in the USA in couple of months. While I missed not having a watch to measure the distances and paces of my runs, I felt a certain “release” and freedom to run without the compulsion to always look down at my watch to see how many miles were behind me, or what my running pace was. I felt free to simply “be in the moment” and enjoy the scenery without defining the moment by my live stats……Until four months later, when I started to miss my Garmin. I was going to look for another outdated, refurbished Forerunner 230, but when I looked for it on the Amazon site, I kept being directed to a new Forerunner 45 instead. The display was very different from the 230, and as I read about its features, I thought it has too many “bells and whistles” that I don’t need….like the “body battery” feature, concerning which I was quite cynical as to how accurate such a feature could really be (similar to my cynicism about my previous watch’s claim to be able to measure my VO2 max). Notwithstanding, at only $139, I considered the watch a great value and purchased it.Just one week into wearing it, I can’t take it off…I’m addicted to it! The most pleasant surprise has been the accuracy and convenience of the built in heart rate monitor, which over the past three long distance runs has proven itself to be every bit as good and accurate as the Garmin chest strap I formally wore with the 230. Now I have around-the-clock, 24 hour heart readings, including my resting heart beat, which again is very accurate (mind you, I wear the watch with the face on the under wrist, which probably provides for a more accurate pulse reading). And the feature I was most cynical about, the “body battery,” has also proven itself a delightful and accurate edition to the repertoire of my watch’s features. How do I know it is accurate? Simply because it accurately expresses exactly how I feel! It is really amazing. Even the clock display, which I thought I would never grow to like–it displays the minutes beneath the hours–has grown on me in just a week, and no longer bothers me. Whereas I used to take off my other Garmins when I went to bed, as they didn’t have any features I felt I need during the night, the 45 model begs to be worn around-the-clock, as it provides vital information–heart rate, sleep, and body clock summaries–the next morning. With these features, especially the “body battery,” the watch is tutoring me as to what my realistic fitness aims should be, on a particular day. If the body battery displays a 25/100 charge, I probably shouldn’t attempt a 12 mile run, like I did nonetheless yesterday, I failed to complete it before hitting “the wall.” I highly recommend this watch an model, which is becoming a dear, dear friend.
A blog listed this running watch as an excellent value. I completely agree. I am just a normal guy running to make sure I don’t die of a heart attack. I just need a watch to keep me at my 10 or 11 minute per mile pace. This GPS watch is perfect for that. It is not a fashion watch (see photo, its a bit big) and is it not as accurate or precise as my phone, which triangulates off cell towers as well as satellites. But I was tired of carrying my phone and concerned about damaging it in sudden weather changes. This watch is great. I can consistently keep on pace and meet my goals. Oh, one other limitation, which maybe I have just not figured out, it does not seem to do intervals very easily. I can pace my entire run, or I can pace my intervals, but I can’t seem to conveniently do both in the same run. But again, it may just be my limitation not that of the watch. I am very satisfied with my purchase and recommend this product.
The watch feels premium with a heavy-duty metal frame. It has a nice weight to it and doesn’t feel cheap. The screen is nicely curved for easy swiping. One thing that is obvious is the wide bezel around the actual screen. The rotating crown on the right side has only one function and that is press, even though it rotates.The 1.55inch screen looks nice even in bright light conditions. However, there is no auto-brightness. I was not able to find a double tap to activate function and the screen has to be activated with a twist of the wrist or with the crown button. Swiping and tapping is very responsive.The charging port is similar to other TicWatches with a magnetically held charger that has two prongs. The magnets are weak and when the watch is sitting on its back the prongs get easily detached. Even light bumps will release the magnets. It’s too bad that it’s not compatible with other TicWatches, like to TicWatch 3 Pro.The watch takes regular 20mm watch bands and it’s easy to swap them with the quick release.The settings on the watch are limited to the very basics and most of the watch settings can be changed with the Mobvoi app. The Mobvoi app has only a limited and rather poor-quality watch face selection available (obviously this is a personal opinion). I wish there were more customizations on each of the watch faces available, e.g. adding sensor readings. There is only a single barebones watch face available that has most of the readings on it. It takes forever to transfer or update a watch face, most times a minimum of 2min.Even with the phone close to the watch the Bluetooth connection failed occasionally, and I had to reconnect through the software to find the watch. I hope this gets fixed via a firmware update.The notifications are limited which is to be expected with a focus on health tracking. If you are looking for a smart watch then I recommend looking elsewhere.Sensors in no particular order:Sleep: It does not recognize the start of my sleep and therefore is consistently short by 2 hours based on actual sleep. I was wearing three watches on my wrist for comparison (Fitbit Inspire 2 and Galaxy Watch 4). Both of the other watches were within 20min of my actual sleep. Maybe another problem with the Ticwatch GTH Pro on the right wrist rather than the typical left wrist for most uses. Screen capture from G4 and Ticwatch GTH Pro attached. The Ticwatch also reports a majority of deep sleep which rarely happens based on the other two watches which are more consistent between the two. For now, both the length and quality of sleep are unreliably recognized.Heart rate: The heart rate monitor works well and shows values similar to the G4 and Inspire2.Skin temperature: I love that the watch has skin temperature measurements. It seems to fluctuate with my exercise (outside versus inside) and should be a good indicator of the emergence of sickness like flu etc.SpO2: This is rather unreliable and random and fluctuates to extreme values during the day. When activated through the watch and holding still, the values are more reliable. Screen capture attached.Step counter: The step counter is pretty accurate and giving results similar to the other two watches I was wearing.Wellness score or Arty: This is a hit and miss during measurement for me. I often have to try 2-3 times before it reads and very often it tells me that the reading is not consistent. Especially when wearing on my right wrist the readings work only 20% of the time. This is pretty frustrating. The values can’t be compared to other watches and it’s scientific meaning is questionable to me for now, e.g. eCAP and HSX or ArtyAge. My arterial age based on the data ranges between 20-30 and 50-60 in the same time range. I wish I was that young. The inconsistencies are likely coupled to the reading problems with the sensor itself on my right wrist. I am sure that using the watch for a prolonged time there might be value in these measurement results. The scanning is more robust on my left wrist, so my conclusion is that this is working most likely well for lefties.Summary: Some issues in a few places of the software and sensors. This might have to do with me wearing it on my right wrist. The Arty features will take some time to get used to before they can be used reliably to track health, I think. One of the key features compared to expensive smart watches like the Galaxy Watch 4 is the battery life. After 5 days, the battery still had a good 56% left, indicating the promised 7-10 days of battery life. Overall, a pretty solid smart watch for health tracking at a price of just below $100, e.g. heart related features.
After going through three Fitbits that have died on me after a year, I decided to try another brand of smart watch. While I would love an Apple Watch, the need to charge every day is not ideal. I don’t want to have to add charging my watch each day to the many other things I have to remember to do. So, I decided to try this Amazfit GTS 2 Mini. It is among the thinnest and lightest of smart watches, and I didn’t want anything bulky on my arm.I’m really happy with it so far! It has taken about four days to really play with it and understand all that it can do. For instance, today, i just discovered that I can create customized watch faces. I thought I was stuck with the pre-made ones in their watch store. This really makes me feel like I can make the watch very personalized to me.I really like the long battery life. I also like how immediately and quickly it syncs. It used to take my old fitbits FOREVER to sync. I love that I can customize the shortcuts to only see the features I want in the order I want. I love that I could customize the app to hide the features I won’t use and put the features I will use in the order in which I want to see them. I really like the countdown app, the cycle tracker, the meditation breathing, the sleep tracking, the heart rate monitor, step tracker, the weather (although it could be more self-explanatory), the ability to control sound and move forward/backwards when playing music, podcasts, or other audio from my iphone.My favorite feature is that I can have a plain digital clock display with the date, day, and steps when the screen is off. That was the feature that sold me on the watch!The screen is also beautiful. The band is quite plain-looking relative to the beauty of the watch, but I’m just ordering a nicer band to put on it.I got all of these many new features in a device that still cost much less than what I was paying for those Fitbits!!I’m giving it four stars only because I had a few glitches that I hope won’t become long-term issues. One issue was that some of the notifications weren’t coming through. However, after restarting and changing a setting on my phone, it has been back to working fine. The other issue was that after a day or two the digital clock was not displaying when the screen was off. I’m not sure if that was a watch system issue or if I have a setting somewhere that was not configured properly.It does have Alexa (to provide text-based responses), but I disabled it. It only seemed to work when you have the Zepp app open on the phone. Doing that would get so cumbersome that it would defeat the purpose of having it readily available on the watch.Overall, I am very happy with this watch!UPDATE: I’m actually bumping to five stars. I am so much happier with this watch than my old Fitbits. The screen is gorgeous. I realized that I wasn’t getting the digital screen-off clock because the watch turns it off when it thinks I’m sleeping. After I wake and get moving, it starts displaying again. Neat! The displays of notifications are still unclear to me, and it can’t get the weather for the exact place where I live (only for the next county over). Still, I’m really happy with this watch given its price and the other options out there on the market. I notice that I’m using the meditation/breathing bubble app quite often!SECOND UPDATE: They need a better instruction manual for this watch. Just when I think I had discovered all that it can do, I come across other features that I didn’t know about. I didn’t realize that all of the watch faces can come with their own screen off watch faces. Also, the watch faces you customize have their own bare bones screen off watch face (so that you can get the color of text you want for the screen off face). Being able to customize the screen off watch face has been awesome! I also had not understood the “lit when wrist lift” setting. I now have that off, which is what I prefer. Realizing these functions saves battery life and helps me customize the watch even more to my style and liking. As for battery life, in the first week, I got a little over four days of battery life on a full charge. However, I was playing with it a lot and I had not realized how to use the “lit when lift wrist” function. Now that I turned off the “lit when lift wrist function,” I’m getting longer battery life. Even happier with my watch!
tldr, if you’re looking at this you’re in the market for something square and affordable with long battery life. This is that.Most recently been wearing Amazfit Bip S (a competitor to the GTH Pro that’s been on the market longer) and Neo (their retro 80s device with very basic smartwatch functionality–but 3-4 weeks battery life). I previously wore a Ticwatch C2, and this is how Mobvoi contacted me and offered a GTH Pro in exchange for an honest opinion.I also bought one of the cheapest imitators available once ($20 or $30 – the blue LH watch in photo #2). It never worked and was junk from day one. Avoid.Battery life and looks are probably my top priorities, as my functional needs are pretty simple: I want to be able to tell the time, receive notifications, check the date/weather, and keep track of steps – any additional health data after that is value added…… Partly because, if you’ve spent any time with these products, you know their readings can vary WILDLY in accuracy/precision. This TicWatch appears to do a good measuring steps, heart rate, and even blood oxygen content–with a big caveat on that last one. Set up to continuously monitor my vitals, the GTH Pro is recording face-valid blood oxygen content numbers (95-99%). Better than my Bip. Trying to get a reading using the touted “Arty” health feature (it adds up all your vitals to give you an overall measure+”actual age”) is a complete and utter frustration, however. I’ve followed the directions, tried holding it all sorts of ways, and remained as still as I can, but always an error. Note that Arty asks you to place your index finger on the RH side of the watch (where additional sensors are). The watch is already calculating SPO numbers, as mentioned previously, so….. I sincerely hope that a software update improves the Arty function for whatever additional measuring capacity it offers. As is, 9/10 times it gives me an error when I try to use it, and occasionally it’ll tell me my saturation is 50% something.Battery life appears to be as advertised (which is what I’ve generally found with the mainstream brand devices). My first full charge lasted a full 7 days, and that was with a lot of futzing (and most options on). So I’m confident it’ll last in that 7-10 day range, which is a really convenient place to be — but nowhere near the length of an e ink-display watch or my faithful Bip.The display on the GTH Pro is excellent: Clean, crisp, high contrast, easily viewable outdoors + from all angles. The watch is also fast: There are no hiccups or slowdowns as you move from screen-to-screen. Very smooth experience on the watch.Mobvoi’s accompanying app does a lot really well. There’s a ton of health data to review, and it’s easily accessible and organizable. No issues viewing, recording, or passing along to other apps (Google Fit).No pairing issues to date! “Lift to wake screen” function works without fault.Notifications are coming through correctly without a hitch.Sleep tracking seems much better than my other previous devices. On par with the SO’s Fitbit hardware.The watch is attractive, almost exactly the same physical dimensions as Bip S but with a larger screen. The transition from screen to border is invisible from head-on, you need to eyeball it from an angle to discern. No scratches or scuffs to immediately report. Nicer than average silicon (tpu?) watch band.Here are my two main complaints, for what it’s worth.First, I’d like more watch faces! The benefit of Mobvoi’s customized watch OS is how zippy it performs, but you loose the huge pool of watchfaces available for stock WearOS. For me, that’s the only limitation, but if you also use a lot of other 3rd party WearOS apps, you may not find equivalents here. On the GTH Pro, I don’t see anything I need missing. And while there are a *decent* number of watchfaces, I’d prefer a whole heckuva lot more. (I’m counting something like 119 at the moment, with two new ones just added. But you know how a majority just aren’t your style right off the bat.). The main page of the Mobvoi app shows a TON of (round) faces, so hopefully they continue adding to the GTH Pro’s options.The single greatest negative with the GTH Pro is (as mentioned in other reviews) **drum roll please** the charging cable. It comes coiled up, the magnets attaching the tiny *oval* charging nub to the back of the watch are too weak, and the watch generally upsets the charger as you try to set it down. The cord will tend to jiggle the charger loose. It might look like its on there, but nope, no current. It takes a steady hand and a lot of intention to get the watch sitting on the nub charging.Overall, it’s a really solid option at the current price point $100. The day-to-day user experience of the watch–the nice display, the stutter-free operation, *most* of the reliable health readings–make it a great daily driver. And indeed, it’s what I’m continuing to wear. Like it a lot.+++ Battery life+++ Display+++ Responsiveness— Selection of watchfaces— Terrible charger— Arty doesn’t like me
Not much to say other than if you know what this is, and its features are useful to what you are doing, then it’s worth the money. Everything you need, nothing you don’t. Like any good tool in the tool box, it just works as it should, and is a solid piece in all conditions so far. The Solar actually works really really well, and I plug it in maybe once a month for a couple hours. I wear it daily, generally 24 hours a day. So if you are on the fence with the price, you won’t be disappointed. It is legit worth it.
great for running, although the gps is a bit slow. No real complaints as a running watch!A lot of the displays could use work. Things aren’t labeled. None of the graphs scale at all, so they look totally flat w/ just 2 pts labeled (e.g. heartrate is just s wiggly line at about 0.15 on whatever scale it is, whether my pulse is 49 or 115 it looks the same).The “moveIQ” feature just doesn’t work as well as a fitbit; it isn’t customizable, and it tells me I need to move while I’m mid walk or doing yardwork, and then it says “move bar cleared” when I’m sitting motionless. That needs work!Not to pile on, but w/ no phone paired/no bluetooth, and default settings (~1.5s backlight, gps only during runs, heartrate on), I get like 3.5d of battery life instead of the claimed 7d.OK, that may sound negative, but overall it’s hands down the best I’ve had for running. Just the rest of the (less important) stuff needs some (mostly software) work.It isn’t too big (I got the 45s as I have tiny wrists for a dude). I think there’s a lot of potential here, and “fresh from the box” it does what I need for running. The pc/web apps work fine and have lots of info (again, graph scaling is terrible; c’mon guys the code for this has been public since before any of y’all were born, it’s not hard). It seems to do well on route logging, distance, pace, etc. although I haven’t tried to rigorously calibrate it (just using it’s defaults, but it seems ok so far).So, very high marks for a casual runner. If I really wanted a lifestyle fitness monitor I’d probably pick a fitbit, like my wife uses tho. But I expect this will improve (already a lot of s/w updates, some pretty substantial).—- followup—I’m increasingly skeptical of the heart rate monitor accuracy. It says my sleeping HR is 41-45; pretty sure I’d be dead? walking across the room it frequently says 115. reading? anywhere from 51-90..wth? Lifting for 45m? 65 while lifting but randomly jumping to 100+ when I’m resting for a longer break. I’m exactly avg size/wt for adult male, and in “meh” shape after 2020-21, very casual run/lift a couple times a week. In the past i’ve checked and gotten much more reasonable & consistent HR (60-65 resting, ~100+exercising, etc.) manually. Still happy w/ the running watch time & distance & logging tho.
I’ve had this watch for about 8 months and it’s my first smart watch. I got it to track fitness, but it’s been great for lots of other reasons too.Pros:-Battery ~2 week battery life (occasionally recording GPS activities) or ~2 days on a trip with heavy GPS use (but it’s nice to not have to use the phone to record GPS activities, that way the phone battery lasts for when needed on trips).-Screen is visible in all conditions and I have used it for a flashlight briefly when camping.- Alarm clock/timers – it’s harder to miss these when they are attached to your wrist and rumble.- Notifications work well – they show up on the watch about one second later than the phone and the “Connect” app lets you choose which apps you don’t want notifications going to the watch. Notifications also have some options that can be controlled from the watch.- Recording an activity is SO easy (without a watch like this, I used to have to get a phone out, open an app, hit record, then get it out after to stop the recording). Takes ~10 seconds for the watch to get GPS signal outside, but you can immediately start recording before then if you want. You literally press a button (it remembers your last activity and will default to that, or you can scroll to another activity), then you press the same button once to select an activity, then the same button to start recording, then the same button to pause/stop (it has preset activities with logos, e.g. “Run”, or you can define your own). The web version of the “Connect” app is awesome and lets you export your GPS recordings to a file (standard format). The screens for each activity are very customizable (e.g. you can make it show a couple stats per page and a couple pages whenever hiking, and a different set of stats/pages for whenever recording a certain other activity).- Fitness goals are visible on the watch (especially if you customize your home screen to show your step count), keeping you aware of how you’re doing on these goals throughout the day (shows an alert when you clear a “move bar” after sitting a while, and an alerts for when you meet your daily step/stairs goals).- Moon/sun stats, and you can fast-forward a day at a time to see these stats for upcoming days.- Sensors – it’s nice to see your heart rate, altitude, and other things on graphs. These graphs don’t have labels reference points (the screen is not high resolution, so I’m not sure where they’d fit), but you can see the current values. I once went in a trip with 2 others who had the same watch, and after ascending then descending ~3,000 feet over 8 miles, our watches were within 100 feet of accuracy for that altitude compared across all of them. The heart rate sensor occasionally under-reports my heart rate (by ~50 bpm), but most of the time it seems right on (a friend with the same watch shared that this also happens for them occasionally). Overall, the sensors are great, and it’s fun to measure water temperature (I did this in 106⁰F hot springs) and always have a compass handy.Cons:The pros far outweigh the cons for me, but here they are:- Software – The software with its existing features is solid and straightforward (major props to Garmin), but the “Connect” app doesn’t let you see waypoints the watch has saved. You will need to use the BaseCamp desktop app (maybe there are other ways I don’t know about, like perhaps the InReach app). It would also be awesome if there were more 3rd party phone apps, and especially awesome if this watch could run custom apps (or even just watch faces, but I do see that this can be tricky on a small monochrome screen). So much of the watch is customizable, which makes it awesome, but I would love to see even more customization (weather – not just C/F for it’s customization, but also choices for which weather stats to show).- Weather – Limited information is shown and not a lot can be customized. No humidity, and you can only see the next four hours and next four days (which doesn’t include wind speed for forecasts, and you will probably need to look up what all the pictograms mean on the Garmin website for each type of weather status – maybe this is in the manual but I missed it). It would be so great to be able to see the whole rest of the day and a seven day forecast.- Slightly bulky – but this also makes it tough, and I choose tough and bulky over thin and flimsy.- Sleep tracking isn’t amazing (it thinks I’m sleeping when I read before bed – even in a chair), but it’s great considering it’s just a watch attached to my arm – and you can edit previous nights’ sleep in the app if the algorithm/sensors got it wrong.After weighing the pros and cons, I would recommend this watch to anyone looking for a tough smart watch. This watch has improved my experiences. It cuts out the need to keep my phone in hand. It’s technology that doesn’t get in the way too much. Garmin updates firmware regularly, and who knows, but maybe some of the missing features I’d like to see might be added soon or already added in the Instinct 2. I haven’t looked into it much yet, but I don’t think the cons are a big enough reason for me to upgrade yet, as this watch does everything I bought it for and does it well.
Chose this route for a GPS after some careful consideration, and a buddies recommendation. I will never turn back! First off the main reason I choose this was due to the fact that I needed a new GPS after my old one broke. The biggest reason I had was, I new I would carry my phone with me even if I handheld GPS. The watch is supported by 2 main apps the Connect app and the Explore app. the explore app lets me use topo maps and everything a handheld gps has, or I can set points in it and have the watch take me on the trail. I use the watch a lot to track my hikes and to geocache. I like that it lets me track fishing as well and mark spots with time and weather conditions as well when I get a fish. The only big thing I wish it had was a way to track Motorized rides effectively, I currently just use the bike widget but I don’t need the health info when I’m on my motorcycle or 4 wheeler.
Ok ive had the Tic Watch E3 two weeks and its time for a review!TL:DR its great, go get one and try it out!My last watch was an asus zenwatch 2, so ive been out of the game for a little bit. I was looking for something new and affordable since upgrading from a note 9 to a S22 plus. The Tic Watch E3 is really it!Initial setup is a breeze and had everything going within minutes of taking it out of the box.First things first,The battery life. Its great, up to two days between a fast charge before work (takes about a half hour i think to get a full charge). Im using all the bells and whistles too. Heart rate, steps, sleep, oxygen, gps, spotify and probably more. Really quite surprised actually considering how light this watch is.This watch is LIGHT! i almost dont like wearing watches because i like my arms to weigh the same. Lol but seriously, between the weight of my old watch and its battery life, i just stopped using it. The Tic Watch E3 is some serious hardware and weighs almost nothing by comparison.The display, its bright and easy to read even in full daylight and adjustible. the touch sensor on the watch is very well made too. I never thought a keyboard on a display that small would be easy to use. But it is! Ive used it to log into my Tic account to keep track of my activity. And used it to reply to messages. Its surprisingly easy and accurate.Sleep tracking is very informative, I’ve actually been sleeping better now that i can see how my routines affect my sleep. And when i feel like i didnt sleep well i have all the info i need to convince my self that i actually did.Heart rate, steps and GPS are all very accurate and informative. Makes me want to do more in order to break previous records ive set or keep consistent. And when ive been sitting too long it gives me a reminder to get up and move around for a little bit. Extremely helpful when im on my pc too much. (im always on my pc too much)Its also very easy to manage which apps are notified by the watch and to silence your phones notifications when the watch is active. Helpful so you aren’t buzzing on both devices.Ive been using the Tic apps exclusively on my watch and have no complaints. Plenty of stock watch faces available by default. And through apps like Watchmaker and more you have an endless supply of watch-faces ranging from all the data displayed you can think of to absolute minimal.Instant familiarity if you’ve used any other or previous android wear product with a suite of features and options you’ll find on more expensive models.Waterproofing is very acceptable, i dont plan on swimming with it on (personal preference here, i know the watch would be fine) but i get dirty at work. Ill run it under water to wash off the grime before washing my self up and have had no issues.The glass is tough too, its still as pristine as the day i took it out of the box. Despite the abuse my work causes it.And last but not least, the watch band it comes with i thought i would replace almost right away. As i did with my Zenwatch and almost any other watch (smart or regular) ive owned. To my surprise i did not need nor want to do that in this case. Its just fine, it works, its comfortable and unless the band wears out or breaks ever ill keep it.In conclusion to my review, i really like this watch. Ive become more active and generally enjoy using it. Highly recommend you try it out yourself.
Muy util
No me gusto que no encendiera y por esta razón no puedo hacer nigun comentario sobre su funcionamiento
First, the initial “pairing:” I charged the watch and then pressed the button, and up came a QR Code, which I scanned. This installed something called “ASOS” on my phone, which has nothing to do with the watch. It is some sort of clothing marketing site. I deleted ASOS, and then looked on the inside cover of the small but thick instruction book included with the phone. Another QR code, which I scanned. This installed an App called Amazefit (or something very close to that), which needed “updates.” The first update took two minutes to install, but then reported “fail.” Another update then presented itself, this one taking NINE minutes to install. The progress circle never quit spinning, but eventually I got a Completed notification by shutting down the app and/or rebooting the phone (don’t remember exactly which one). But now the phone showed two different icons, both named Amazefit. Without going into every gory detail, I could not get either of these apps to pair with the watch. I even made sure to “remove” my old Bluetooth watch from the phone, and physically move it out of Bluetooth range. Finally, I looked at the booklet again and spotted below the QR Code: “Download Zepp App.” I went to the app store, and there it was. It worked; phone now paired with watch.Observation: this watch has MANY features. There really is no documentation explaining them, but if you spend enough time just playing with the watch you can figure out MOST of them.Observation: you must establish a “free” account to use the app with the watch. There are some conditions (as yet not run down, specifically) that cause one to be signed out of the account without your knowledge or notification. This means when opening the app to check data, you must sign in again. Amazefit or Zepp or whoever you are: this is VERY ANNOYING.Observation: for unknown reasons (I’m guessing at the moment due to having phone out of blue tooth range), your phone can become unpaired with the watch, even when the two are back in range of each other. My effort to re-pair them doesn’t work (“Connecting” spins forever). until I reboot my iPhone SE. This is VERY ANNOYING.Observation: when the app notifications work, I really like them. Text is easily read on the watch face, and there is almost no lag. HOWEVER, for as yet undetermined reasons, when the watch is paired and everything appears to be working normally, notifications stop. You can check all the “settings” etc. on both watch and app, and all appears normal and just as it was while Notifications were working. I’ve been able to restore them by cycling the phone bluetooth off and on. This is another ANNOYING drawback (UPDATE: yesterday, I received a notification that a software update was available that fixed a problem with IOS 16 — notifications would stop. I installed it: So far so good).As far as accuracy of measurements, everything looks good.One final note: there is a facility within the phone to report bugs and desired improvements back to the manufacturer. I used it to ask how I could be “permanently signed in.” I got back a robo response that Amazefit appreciated my idea for a product enhancement.
The Garmin Forerunner 735xt is a slim, lightweight watch that works well as an exercise companion. Whether you’re running, biking, or swimming, you can count on this watch to give you all the info you need to perform your best. Its GPS is excellent and it has a ton of useful features to help track your workout, such as a heart rate monitor and customizable alerts based on your running pace. I also love that it has physical buttons which saves the hassle of trying to manipulate a touchscreen in the middle of an activity. It’s quite handy to know exactly what one or two clicks will do without ever having to stop and fiddle with the watch, and the best part is you can customize it to your liking. Battery life is also excellent, although I haven’t done a long enough exercise to ever drain the full battery in one go. I will say as far as drawbacks go, the heart rate monitor isn’t always the most reliable. It can take some time to get that initial reading accurately, but it does work well once it gets going. Sleep tracking could also be better, doesn’t have a ton of features found on some newer watches.
This is the second time I have bought the Amazfit watch. Bought my first pair 4 and 1/2 years ago (for my husband and myself) When they started acting up I came back and got another pair. I like the improvements over the older ones we had. The app that goes with the watch is easier to use than the old one. I like the fact that it can track more than one thing like steps, heart rate, oxygen, sleep and stress levels among other things. A very good product for a reasonable price if you are wanting a fitness watch with out extra bells and whistles. I am 63 and my husband is 72 so we are not super up on tech but these watches are easy to use and understand.
I’ve been pleasantly surprised by the Ticwatch Pro 3 Ultra! The watch stands out with unique features in a world where most Wear OS watches aren’t too different from each other.The watch leaves a fantastic first impression. The case is sporty, but restrained; the spiraled knurling and markers around the display add just enough flavor. I have large wrists for a woman, and while the watch felt big at first, I eventually settled into it. It doesn’t scream rugged or outdoorsy, but it hints that it could be those things if you wanted it to be.The dual-layer display is phenomenal, and it should be the reason you’re looking at this watch. Half high-end AMOLED, half liquid-crystal dumbwatch, the extra battery life and great outdoor visibility are features that have always stood out amongst the competition. When you’re not doing smartwatch things on the main screen, the watch can power off the battery-hungry AMOLED display, and switch to displaying the time and basic health information on the LCD, saving enough power that I can consistently get two full days and nights out of one charge, with sleep tracking. This thing lasts longer than any of my other Wear OS watches, and it spends a lot more time than them on my wrist.The watch runs stock Wear OS 2.3, with an update promised to 3.0, but no schedule announced to my knowledge. Mobvoi’s additions to the software are overall very useful. Schedules for Do not Disturb, a battery saving time-only mode, and a fully featured fitness suite (that I haven’t used much) are all very nice to have.Overall, the Pro 3 Ultra is a great package. Battery life is great, the dual display is useful, and the watch itself is attractive. I just hope that the promised Wear 3.0 update comes soon.
For the sale price I can’t complain too much. But the heart beat tracking seems off. Like I was doing a MTB ride and the watch read my peak HR was 155 bpm. No way, I was huffing and puffing, seemed 20 bpm off at least. I do like how it links up with strava and the Garmin app is cool. I can’t seem to get the watch to update though.
I have been a fan of Mobvoi’s Ticwatch line of watches the last few years. This is my third Ticwatch – E, Pro 2020 and now the Pro 3 Ultra. I have no real qualms with this one. Setup was very easy out of the box. What I like most about it (and the Pro 2020), is the design and appearance. It very much feels like a premium watch. It’s got some heft to it and is sturdy without looking like a clunker on your wrist. Asthetically, it’s so much appealing to me than the square Apple watches. The display is vibrant as well.I’ve noticed the charging takes a little bit longer than my Pro 2020, but I suspect it has to do with it having a bit beefier battery. I’ve seen some grouse about their Pro 3 Ultra not getting a full three days out of a full charge, but the more monitors you have running, it’s going to drain it a bit. All told, this isn’t a big deal to me. Is it really a big deal to put it on a charger for a quick top up when you’re in the shower or watching a movie?I’ll admit that I don’t rely on my watch a ton for heart rates and sleep tracking – hence overnight being a great charging opportunity for me. It gives me my notifications, calendar alerts, tracks my steps and aggregates my data just fine. And manuvering through the screens is pretty snappy I must say thanks to the Snapdragon 4100 processor. It’s my first experience with the processor so I’m glad to see Mobvoi implementing it.All told, the Ticwatch is a great value for smartwatch users. That’s why it appeals to me. Even though I typically have the Samsung flagship phones, Ticwatch looks to be a good landing spot for me when it comes to smartwatches because of the price point. And in my experiences, Mobvoi customer service will respond if something isn’t right.