Top 10 best wifi routers for home 2022 For Cost Saving

Rate this post
To help you quickly compare and make an informed decision on the best wifi routers for home, we have rounded up a list of 10 the best wifi routers for home available with some objective information about them. Learn more to choose the most suitable item for you.

10 Best wifi routers for home 2022 short list

Top 10 Best wifi routers for home for 2022 Price and Features Comparison

TP-Link AC1750 Smart WiFi Router (Archer A7) -Dual Band Gigabit Wireless Internet Router for Home, Works with Alexa, VPN Server, Parental Control, QoS

★★★★★
$79.99
$52.00
 in stock
Amazon.com
as of December 31, 2022 1:25 pm

Features

Product Dimensions 9.59 x 6.32 x 1.29 inches
Item Weight 14.9 ounces
ASIN B079JD7F7G
Item model number Wireless Router Archer A7
Best Sellers Rank #768 in Electronics (See Top 100 in Electronics) #2 in Computer Routers
Is Discontinued By Manufacturer No
Date First Available May 27, 2018
Manufacturer TP-Link

  • OneMesh Compatible Router- Form a seamless WiFi when work with TP-Link OneMesh WiFi Extenders
  • Router for wireless internet, works with Alexa, compatible with all Wi-Fi devices, 802.11ac and older
  • Dual band router upgrades to 1750 Mbps high speed internet(450mbps for...

NETGEAR Nighthawk Smart Wi-Fi Router, R6700 - AC1750 Wireless Speed Up to 1750 Mbps | Up to 1500 Sq Ft Coverage & 25 Devices | 4 x 1G Ethernet and 1 x 3.0 USB Ports | Armor Security

★★★★★
$109.99
$67.66
 in stock
Amazon.com
as of December 31, 2022 1:25 pm

Features

Wireless Type ‎802.11ac
Number of USB 3.0 Ports ‎1
Brand ‎NETGEAR
Series ‎R6700-100NAS
Item model number ‎R6700-100NAS
Operating System ‎Microsoft Windows 7, 8, 10, Vista, XP, 2000, Mac OS, UNIX, or Linux
Item Weight ‎1.58 pounds
Product Dimensions ‎11.22 x 7.2 x 2.44 inches
Item Dimensions LxWxH ‎11.22 x 7.2 x 2.44 inches
Color ‎Black
Voltage ‎100120 Volts
Manufacturer ‎Netgear
ASIN ‎B00R2AZLD2
Country of Origin ‎China
Is Discontinued By Manufacturer ‎No
Date First Available ‎December 16, 2014

  • Maximum Range : 1500 Sq Ft
  • Recommended for up to 25 devices: Reliably stream videos, play games, surf the internet, and connect smart home devices
  • Wired Ethernet ports: Plug in computers, game consoles, streaming players, and other nearby wired devices with 4 x 1 gigabit...

Linksys Mesh Wifi 5 Router, Tri-Band, 2,000 Sq. ft Coverage, Supports Guest WiFi, Parent Control, 20+ Devices, Speeds up to (AC2200) 2.2Gbps - MR8300

★★★★★
$199.99
$128.99
 in stock
Amazon.com
as of December 31, 2022 1:25 pm

Features

Wireless Type ‎5 GHz Radio Frequency, 2.4 GHz Radio Frequency
Brand ‎Linksys
Series ‎WIFI 5
Item model number ‎MR8300
Operating System ‎Android,Ios
Item Weight ‎1.59 pounds
Product Dimensions ‎7.3 x 10.1 x 6.3 inches
Item Dimensions LxWxH ‎7.3 x 10.1 x 6.3 inches
Color ‎Black
Voltage ‎120240 Volts
Manufacturer ‎Linksys
ASIN ‎B07L9282JK
Country of Origin ‎Vietnam
Date First Available ‎January 7, 2019

  • Provides up to 2,000 square feet of Wi-Fi coverage for 20plus wireless devices
  • Works with existing modem, simple setup through Linksys App. A mobile device with Android 4.4 or iOS 9 and higher, Bluetooth preferred
  • Enjoy 4K HD streaming, gaming and more in high quality...

TP-Link N450 WiFi Router - Wireless Internet Router for Home (TL-WR940N)

★★★★★
$49.99
$24.99
 in stock
Amazon.com
as of December 31, 2022 1:25 pm

Features

Standing screen display size ‎7.9 Inches
Wireless Type ‎802.11bgn
Brand ‎TP-Link
Series ‎N450
Item model number ‎TL-WR940N
Operating System ‎Microsoft Windows 98SE, NT, 2000, XP, Vista or Windows 7, Windows8/ 8.1/10, MAC OS, NetWare, UNIX or Linux
Item Weight ‎10.6 ounces
Product Dimensions ‎5.7 x 9.1 x 1.4 inches
Item Dimensions LxWxH ‎5.7 x 9.1 x 1.4 inches
Processor Count ‎1
Computer Memory Type ‎DDR3 SDRAM
Power Source ‎Battery-Powered
Voltage ‎9 Volts
Manufacturer ‎TP-LINK USA
Language ‎English
ASIN ‎B003Y5RYNY
Country of Origin ‎Vietnam
Is Discontinued By Manufacturer ‎No
Date First Available ‎August 2, 2010

  • Wireless N speed up to 450Mbps, ideal for bandwidth-intensive tasks like HD video streaming, VoIP, and online gaming. Not compatible with phoneline internet.
  • 802.11n technology, 15x faster with 5x the range of 802. 11g, Three antennas for increased coverage and stability, System...

TP-Link AX1800 WiFi 6 Router (Archer AX21) – Dual Band Wireless Internet Router, Gigabit Router, USB port, Works with Alexa - A Certified for Humans Device

★★★★★
$99.99
$69.99
 in stock
Amazon.com
as of December 31, 2022 1:25 pm

Features

Wireless Type ‎802.11n, 802.11ax, 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11ac
Number of USB 2.0 Ports ‎1
Brand ‎TP-Link
Series ‎Archer AX21
Item model number ‎Archer AX21
Operating System ‎Internet Explorer 11+, Firefox 12.0+, Chrome 20.0+, Safari 4.0+, or other JavaScript-enabled browserCable or DSL Modem (if needed)Subscription with an internet service provider (for internet access)
Item Weight ‎1.1 pounds
Product Dimensions ‎10.28 x 5.3 x 1.61 inches
Item Dimensions LxWxH ‎10.28 x 5.3 x 1.61 inches
Manufacturer ‎TP-Link
ASIN ‎B08H8ZLKKK
Country of Origin ‎Vietnam
Date First Available ‎August 28, 2020

  • VPN Server and Client: Archer AX21 Supports both VPN Server and VPN Client (Open/PPTP/L2TP over Ipsec)
  • Certified for Humans: Smart home made easy for non-experts. Setup with Alexa is simple
  • Dual-Band WiFi 6 Internet Router: Wi-Fi 6(802.11ax) technology achieves faster...

TP-Link AX5400 WiFi 6 Router (Archer AX73)- Dual Band Gigabit Wireless Internet Router, High-Speed ax Router for Streaming, Long Range Coverage

★★★★★
$199.99
$159.99
 in stock
Amazon.com
as of December 31, 2022 1:25 pm

Features

Product Dimensions 10.73 x 5.8 x 1.94 inches
Item Weight 1.46 pounds
ASIN B08TH4D3QV
Item model number Archer AX73
Best Sellers Rank #776 in Electronics (See Top 100 in Electronics) #3 in Computer Routers
Date First Available March 28, 2021
Manufacturer TP-Link
Country of Origin Vietnam

  • Gigabit WiFi for 8K Streaming – Up to 5400 Mbps WiFi for faster browsing, streaming, gaming and downloading, all at the same time
  • Full Featured WiFi 6 Router– Equipped with 4T4R and HE160 technologies on the 5 GHz band to enable max 4.8 Gbps ultra-fast connections.Power:12 V ⎓...

TP-Link Deco Mesh WiFi System (Deco S4) – Up to 5,500 Sq.ft. Coverage, Replaces WiFi Router and Extender, Gigabit Ports, Works with Alexa, 3-pack

★★★★★
$129.99  in stock
Amazon.com
as of December 31, 2022 1:25 pm

Features

Product Dimensions 3.57 x 3.57 x 6.39 inches
Item Weight 4.2 pounds
ASIN B084GTH5LL
Item model number Deco S4(3-Pack)
Best Sellers Rank #553 in Electronics (See Top 100 in Electronics) #5 in Whole Home & Mesh Wi-Fi Systems
Date First Available February 21, 2020
Manufacturer TP-Link
Country of Origin Vietnam

  • A New Way to WiFi: Deco Mesh technology gives you a better WiFi experience in all directions with faster WiFi speeds and strong WiFi signal to cover your whole home.
  • Bettern Coverage than traditional WiFi routers: Deco S4 three units work seamlessly to create a WiFi mesh network...

NETGEAR 4-Stream WiFi 6 Dual-Band Gigabit Router (WAX202) – AX1800 Wireless Speed (Up to 1.8 Gbps) | Coverage up to 1,200 sq. ft, 40 Devices

★★★★★
$99.99
$50.89
 in stock
Amazon.com
as of December 31, 2022 1:25 pm

Features

Wireless Type ‎802.11ax
Brand ‎NETGEAR
Series ‎WAX202-100NAS
Item model number ‎WAX202-100NAS
Item Weight ‎2.26 pounds
Package Dimensions ‎11.18 x 7.99 x 3.94 inches
Manufacturer ‎Netgear
ASIN ‎B097HMLTQX
Date First Available ‎July 12, 2021

  • Fast AX1800 Gigabit speed with WiFi 6 technology for uninterrupted streaming, HD video gaming, and web conferencing
  • Connects to your existing cable modem and replaces your WiFi router. Compatible with any internet service provider up to 1Gbps including cable, satellite, fiber,...

NETGEAR WiFi Router (R6330) - AC1600 Dual Band Wireless Speed (up to 1600 Mbps) | Up to 1200 sq ft Coverage & 20 Devices | 4 x 1G Ethernet and 1 x 2.0 USB Ports (R6330-1AZNAS)

★★★★★
$79.99
$62.95
 in stock
Amazon.com
as of December 31, 2022 1:25 pm

Features

Product Dimensions 9.27 x 5.94 x 2.14 inches
Item Weight 1.47 pounds
ASIN B082N5N3R1
Item model number R6330-1AZNAS
Best Sellers Rank #3,916 in Electronics (See Top 100 in Electronics) #36 in Computer Routers
Date First Available January 23, 2020
Manufacturer Netgear
Country of Origin Taiwan

  • FAST WI-FI PERFORMANCE: Get up to 1200 square feet wireless coverage with AC1600 speed (Dual band up to 300 + 1300 Mbps)
  • RECOMMENDED FOR UP TO 20 DEVICES: Reliably stream videos play games surf the internet and connect smart home devices
  • WIRED ETHERNET PORTS: Plug in...

Amazon eero 6 mesh Wi-Fi Router | Supports speeds up to 900 mbps | Connect to Alexa | Coverage up to 1,500 sq. ft. | 2020 release

★★★★★
$89.00  in stock
Amazon.com
as of December 31, 2022 1:25 pm

  • WHOLE-HOME WI-FI 6 COVERAGE - eero covers up to 1,500 sq. ft. with wifi and supports wifi speeds up to 900 Mbps.
  • SAY GOODBYE TO DEAD SPOTS AND BUFFERING - Our TrueMesh technology intelligently routes traffic to reduce drop-offs so you can confidently stream 4K video, game, and...

How To Buy The Best wifi routers for home In 2022

Nowadays, Best Routers For The Money has helped our life become very easy and comfortable. However, with so many different types of Best Routers For The Money on the market, finding the right one for you can be a bit tough. To help you choose the Best Routers For The Money, here are our several recommendations. Price The first thing you should look for will be determined by your budget. The price of a product is decided by the brand, including features, high-tech function, and other factors. Everyone has a budget, but buying on the cheap isn’t always the best option. After all, if you buy a Best Routers For The Money that breaks quickly or doesn’t entirely fulfill your demands, you’ll have to replace it sooner or later, costing you even more than buying a good one in advance. Brands There are various Best Routers For The Money brands on the market today, but this article will only focus on the brand: Speedefy, Aenllosi, TP-Link, NETGEAR, Linksys, ARRIS, Motorola, Belkin, WAVLINK, Ubiquiti Networks, ARRlS Products are ranked by our W Score system, but they should only be used as a reference for you to select the Best Routers For The Money. Safety You surely want to stay as safe as possible when using any products. As a consequence, one of the most important things to look for when buying a Best Routers For The Money is the safety measures that have been added. Also, make sure that you read the instruction books thoroughly before operating a machine. What is W Score and is it reliable? W Score is our website’s unique ranking system created by our expert team. The scores from 0 to 10 are automatically evaluated by our AI Report tool depending on the collected data, which includes many criteria through customers’ experience and experts’ advice. For instance, in the article Best Routers For The Money of 2022, our AI tool has estimated and analyzed: 16 products 122,012 reviews from many reputable newspapers, forums, and social networks on the topic Best Routers For The Money The price of each product at the time of AI crawl.

FAQ for wifi routers for home In 2022

Warranty

We are all about product reviews. We do not sell any items. The seller is responsible for the warranty of the products you buy. If you encounter any problems with your purchased product, please visit “here.”

Final Though

Find best price for shopping now!

best wifi routers for home


Mark Cuban

Mark Cuban

I am a former restaurant executive who later ran a home cleaning business in Akron, Ohio. I spend most of his time interacting with homeowners. Lately, I have been sharing his cleaning expertise online, giving incredible tips and tricks on how to select the right products, and clean your home like a pro!

20 Comments
  1. Unfortunately Amazon throws all the reviews together for several DIFFERENT Netgear router models. For example, I am writing about the AC1000 R6080 but of the 1900+ reviews linked to that model’s page, the vast majority are for other models, like the Nighthawk or R700. So when customers ask a question the answer is often wrong as the one answering is answering for the model they bought, when the one asking might be asking about a different model… and everyone thinks they’re on the same page, when they’re not. I really wish Amazon would keep reviews for specific models separate unless the only difference is something immaterial like color (which doesn’t apply to routers but could to things like tablets).Case in point: When looking at the AC1000 R6080 here, and jumping down to the reviews, then entering “QoS” in the question field, several people asked about QoS and the answer was the router has great QoS controls. In fact, the AC1000 has no QoS controls. I believe it might have Dynamic QoS which is not configurable by the end user. The normal “QoS” tab does not appear anywhere in the config menus and QoS is not mentioned anywhere in the manual. I clicked on the reply that answered “Yes” and Amazon linked it to a picture of a different model — the Nighthawk. But you wouldn’t know that by just reading the answer (unless you clicked on it too).On to the review. I got this router — the AC1000 R6080 — to work with a Zoom 5370 16×4 686mbps cable modem. I returned the router after just 2 days use.Cons (starting with less important to more):1. LEDs are on TOP so you can’t see them without standing up.2. No QoS or even a way to see how the Dynamic QoS is set (if it even has that)3. Worst of all, *wired* connectivity through router is only ~70% of what it is directly through the modem. (117mbps modem/84mbps router)4. Wifi is also slower than normal (45-54mbps).5. The above last two cons are due to 10/100 LAN ports (including the Internet port that goes to modem) which are too slow if you have 100mbps service or higher.Pros:1. It’s returnable.Although it’s rated for 300mbps + 700mbps (using both bands) which equals 1Gb… it is not a “gigabit router”. The LAN ports are 10/100 (operate at 100mbps minus overhead) which is practically legacy now. It would probably work well for broadband up to 50mbps perhaps, but if you have a faster service the 10/100 LAN ports will bottleneck your connection.It’s hard to understand why Netgear would make an AC model with 10/100 LANs since 802.11ac is the newest, fastest wifi adapter standard. Even though you can certainly have an ac adapter and only pay for slow broadband, the router should meet the standards AC is capable of handling. Especially considering it is ‘parading’ as a ‘1Gb router’ by the 300 + 700 rating.To get your money’s worth of ISP service of 100mbps or higher, you will need to get a true gigabit router, identified by 10/100/1000 LAN ports (1Gb ports). The modem will make a 1Gb connection to the router in this case and deliver the full speed of your service at 100+mbps (or higher) with no overhead loss.I replaced the R6080 with the  NETGEAR AC1200 Smart WiFi Router – Dual Band Gigabit (R6230) , and sure enough, speed wired through the router is now identical to being wired directly to the modem (117mbps either way). Even Wifi improved by 30+% thanks to the faster connection between modem and router… the R6080 delivered just 45-54mbps while the R6232 delivers 75mbps over wifi. (That’s nearly what the R6080 delivered WIRED!) It also has QoS controls and a whole lot of other options, PLUS a separate, physical, wifi on/off switch… so you can turn the radios off at night when you’re done online, but leave the router up to save power cycling (which can theoretically wear these devices). And a physical switch is a whole lot more convenient that having to use the GUI to turn radios off/on, or use a schedule when your own schedule varies. Even better, it’s only about $15 more.Conclusion: If you want to future proof your investment, get an AC gigabit router with 10/100/1000 LAN ports. It will work with slower services but will also be there for you when you advance to faster services so you won’t have to buy a router twice.Note: So far the R6230 is not listed as being DD-WRT tested, for those interested in flashing that [optional] custom FW, but for all I know someone’s already done it. I haven’t gotten that far yet.

  2. Before you read the review below, I wanted to briefly detail my small internet/network setup struggles. We moved into a new apartment which has solid concrete walls. It is a 1600 sq ft home with two levels. The modem connection is up stairs in the living room. Our two bedrooms are on the lower level.My main issue has been trying to get a strong and decent signal on the lower level. I tried multiple set ups (large router, mesh router, wifi extenders/repeater, and powerline), but I ultimately ran a wire from the upper level to lower. The main reason for running a wire was that I was only getting a fraction (at the most 200-300Mbps on the download) of my 1gb speed on the lower level.My current setup (update):1. TP-Link Wifi 6 AX6000 (main router on upper level).2. TP-Link Wifi 6 AX6000 (lower level router as access point. Cat7 wire from main router). My second AC4000 5G signals became very unstable. I did not have this issue with my first AC4000. I could not get a AC4000 replacement so I upgraded the lower level router to an AX6000.3. I am still getting download speeds in the 900-950Mbps wired, 500-600Mbps 5G, 40-60 2G.The devices I tried include:1. Linksys Tri-Band Mesh Wifi Router for Home (Max-Stream AC2200 MU-Mimo Wireless Mesh Router, Fast Wireless Router)2. NETGEAR Orbi Ultra-Performance Whole Home Mesh WiFi System – WiFi router and single satellite extender with speeds up to 3Gbps over 5,000 sq. feet, AC3. TP-Link AC4000 Smart WiFi Router – Tri Band Router, MU-MIMO, VPN Server, Advanced Security by Homecare, 1.8GHz CPU, Gigabit, Beamforming, Link Aggrega4. TP-Link WiFi 6 AX6000 8-Stream Smart WiFi Router – Next-Gen 802.11ax, 2.5G WAN Port, 8 Gigabit LAN Ports, MU-MIMO, 1.8GHz Quad-Core CPU, USB 3.0 Ports5. ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AX11000 AX11000 Tri-Band 10 Gigabit WiFi Router, Aiprotection Lifetime Security by Trend Micro, Aimesh Compatible for Mesh WIFI System, Next-Gen Wifi 6, Wireless 802.11Ax, 8 X Giga (Purchased at Best Buy)6. TP-Link Powerline Adapter AV2000 Mbps – Gigabit Port, Ethernet Over Power, Plug&Play, Power Saving, MU-MIMO, Noise Filtering(TL-PA9020P KIT)7. WiFi Range Extender – 1200Mbps WiFi Repeater Wireless Signal Booster, 2.4 & 5GHz Dual Band WiFi Extender with Gigabit Ethernet Port, Simple SetupLinksys Tri-Band Mesh Wifi Router for Home (in a two story apartment with solid concrete walls)SetupThe setup was very quick and simple. It took no more than 15 minutes. I decided to broadcast the Wifi signals separately, so I can dictate myself what device connects to which Wifi band. However, the Linksys Smart Wifi does work very well.There were no issues accessing the router from the app or the webpage. More detail settings and configuration are achieved from the webpage access. One thing to note that with this router, you need a node to access the second 5G band.Range and SpeedI have Xfinity 1gb internet connect. The router was placed on the upper level. The wired speed from the modem averaged low 900s Mbps. On the same level the Wifi range and strength was phenomenal. I got strong 2G and 5G signals anywhere on the upper level. Max download speed on my iphone XR Max and laptop was 600Mbps for 5G and 20-30Mbps on 2G. I had no issues with random disconnects or slow downs. However, on the lower, the signal strength was very poor. For the 5G band I was getting on more than 10Mbps, even when I was located under the router. The 2G signal faired a little better at 20-30Mbps.I also used this router with a powerline and it work great. I used powerline and moved this router to the lower level. Modem to powerline (upper level), then powerline (lower level) to router. Through the powerline, my speed 200Mbps (wired). After connecting the powerline to the router, my wired speed was 170-180Mbps, 5G 120-130Mbps, and 2G 20-30Mbps. However, moving the router to the lower level meant I was sacrificing the Wifi signal on the upper level.Why did I return it-Need to have a node to access the second 5G band.-Wifi could not penetrate to the lower level. However, this is more of an issue with the concrete walls.Would I recommend this router?I would definitely recommend this router based on the following:-Reasonably priced.-Simple and quick setup.-Consistent range and speed (if you have a single level home without concrete walls).

  3. NETGEAR Nighthawk has greatly disappointed me…If you read nothing below, take my word for it, don’t invest in products this company sells. They’re not selling quality long-lasting, reliable electronics, nor do they provide good service to their customers… they’re selling poor functioning, quick to fail, seemingly manufactured with little to no attention to quality, nor consumer satisfaction priority. They’re overcharging for crappy products, seemingly taking advantage of their customers financially & other ways…. profiting selfishly from un-integral business practices. I share this information after communicating with several other customers, family, friends, colleagues, all you share this terrible experience, some even worse than mine, which is why I feel compelled to share this with other potential buyers.Apple, unlike this company, provides extremely quality products that evolve & improve over time, that not only do the customers profit greatly due to the quality of their products & Customer Service, they profit as a company who’ll continue thriving I’m sure many lifetimes beyond my feeble human imagination. In the past, I perceived they were ripping me off but time & time again I have felt, & thus can rely that I will feel this same way in the future, that I got something worth what I paid & sometimes more.****First things first, I am not the account holder of this account, I purchased this router through this account administrator because she’s family. So, any bad juju anyone would like to share, or feedback/questions of any kind, is welcomed by me. I will not re-enter this account for responses of feedback, I am the account admin for Elena Mae Brown. I’m sure I’m easy to find if you would like to reach me.Lucky for any readers of this review, I have all the time in the world to write it because I have no internet to do the extensive work, I must take care of. Simply furthers my argument that this NETGEAR company fails to take care of their customers… BELOW IS A NOVEL WITH SEVERAL GRAMMATICAL ERRORS THAT I WILL NOT DEDICATE ANY MORE OF MY TIME TO FIXXING… I suppose I’m off to the library or a coffee shop since I have no internet thanks to good old NETGEAR…Today, I got to experience the ultimate joy of something we’ve all experienced as adults in the modern technological age. My Internet failed in & out all day long, on the phone with different companies & different individuals in different departments for hours on end, my valuable time was devalued extensively. & despite my time dedication, I got zero resolution of my problem.Since moving into our new apartment in January, we have only had her Internet go out two times & quickly called spectrum or promptly taken care of & our problem was resolved. Today I did the same, as always, they provided me with any & every possible service they make readily available to all customers throughout all times of day no matter how much time it takes to resolve any issues on their part. After calling Spectrum & them concluding that there was absolutely no problem on their end, they guided me to call NETGEAR to assist me with Resolving my router dysfunction.The cherry on top, oh what a lovely surprise It was, to be told by the service representative on the phone following being on hold for 30 minutes, that the router we purchased months ago (late July) is no longer under their responsibility as far as Technical Support? So, their Technical Support offering had an extremely short limited time warranty which I was not informed of a purchase I’m completely appalled by when I compare it to my experiences with other companies.{{Never in my entire life have I ever contacted a manufacture of an electronic device that I own  , has any company ever failed to provide me with the ultimate time consuming technical service over the phone or via my giving them access to the device while remaining on the line with them during which I get to watch them move the mouse & make all these changes & technical coding entrances, & my issues are always resolved before the communication with said manufactures comes to an end — A few examples: Epson, Tyson, Microsoft, Apple, Xbox, automatic sensor receptive no touched rash can manufacture, & the list goes on}So, what does background information you could see that this experience would be very upsetting & disappointing in the company that I am vested financially & providing me with unnecessary expensive piece of technology.So, in attempt to summarize this review, I went ahead & called the phone number that Spectrum had so generously & promptly offered to give me, & after a long ridiculous time on hold, I was greeted by a woman on the phone, to whom I expressed my issue I need for a solution, & The manner in which she communicated with me was completely absurd, Constant interruption in the middle of myself talking, terrible attitude, seemed irritated & bothered by my call.From my experience & understanding of severely perfect customer service validating the customer is always right, I determined this exchange as 100% inappropriate Customer Service.Following her terrible communication practice, she stated that the only way she was able to troubleshoot the device was for me to pay immediately: $89 & then this payment I would receive three more months of them providing need technical service & support over the phone. What was the most odd about the woman trying to convince me of this deal, was that she repeated over & over & over, that not only will they service this piece of technology but all the technology pieces in my home for 3 whole months! At this point I promptly informed her that every company I’ve ever purchased any expensive piece of technology from has taken care of me throughout my entire ownership of varying companies products, always treating me as an extremely valued customer & ensuring that not only can I count on them as companies to purchase from in the future, but that their top priority was customer satisfaction simply provided through the electronics functioning at highest capacity thanks to their lifelong assistance (I listed over 8 companies who’ve provided this). Even after I explained this extensively, she repeated w/ my $80 payment, they would take care of all my technology? Having already proven themselves unwilling to care for the single device of theirs I own… unfortunately I repeated myself several times rapidly over & over & over because she kept interrupting, not my finest hour, that I didn’t need that because other companies take care of me endlessly following my purchasing any & every devices from them. All of a sudden after my repeating myself way too many times, out of the blue, suddenly she offered me a deal for $40 through which I would get all the same services. My mind @ this point is legitimately blown.I made it clear that I was unwilling to financially pay for services that any company I’ve ever worked with provides readily & happily to me as the customer. She put me on hold after telling me that she was going to go ask her boss if she could do anything. Cherry on top? Comes back on the line & says “OK so, I got permission from my boss to do this troubleshooting for you one time only for free & I’m going to do it right now”Finally, the grand finale! I called that disconnected, at the beginning of the call she confirmed the callback number for me if we got disconnected & unfortunately no longer to my surprise, she did not call back & has not followed up at all.I invested in this next year router because I had heard great things from those who use them & was willing to pay the extra money to get a quality product.Unfortunately (& fortunately I suppose…), I learned a lot through this exchange. I’ve taken for granted how impressive businesses & manufacturing companies etc., are with absolute 100% unignorable & so damn overwhelmingly delightful their upmost dedication to customer care, respect, readiness & willingness to help in a moment’s notice, & their clear priority of maximizing each buyers satisfaction with the product manufactured by them, made crystal clear by the sense of feeling taken care of that I have following any communication with them… this revelations have come to my attention as more important to me than anything from any company ’ll invest in for life.In conclusion, I find gratitude from this experience not only because I learned that this company is not one I will ever invest in nor recommend others investing, but additionally because it taught me how important it is to make sure anyone we provide service to as human beings feels taken care of especially in cases when they are taken care of us, for example financially & purchasing a service or product. Initially I was filled with rage & out of my mind, following this expression & honesty with other consumers out there, I feel like peace & hope that either customers will go another direction as far as the company they choose for their Internet router, or, which I Believe possible 100%, that this company can alter their practices starting with me by following through on commitment that was made to call me back… & overtime treat their customers with other respect & expression of how much we are valued because without us, any company fails. I’m surprised if any single human being read this entire review but I hope it has some sort of positive impact on any individuals reading or on the company… Call back won’t fix this for me, & without any greater action on their part as a company I will never again purchased from them & will give my honest opinion to every single person who asks me about them as a company.I’m an advocate for creating a world in which every single human enjoys & loves waking up every day to a life filled with love, connection, & the internal understanding & deep rooted knowing of the reality that there’s nothing more valuable then each individual alone (we each are equally as valuable as any other human on this planet). Stand up, speak up, express your vulnerabilities & your strengths openly with as many people as you possibly can because this will have a profound impact. Splashed in a small bite of my philosophy.So much time with my cellular data to write a review, but zero Internet connection to do my work… NETGEAR, do better, not for the selfish gain of your profits, but for the human beings such as yourself Who like you, valuable & deserve to be taken care of & feel taken care of by those that they trust. I’m sure you’re a massive corporation… Or owned by some other national business conglomerate… The number of you is absolutely not important, what is important is the each of you dedicate your hearts & your lives to treating others as your heart aches for people to treat you. Signing off, I hope you reach out NETGEAR make it up to me as well as any other customer whose experienced such a terrible experience of customer service. I understand fees & charges overtime, I do not except fees & charges I am not informed of at the beginning of my initial purchase being imposed on me when I simply need assistance…To all of you individuals out there, just like myself & just like every other person but you crossed paths with each & every day, but I know how important you are & how were the you are of everything beautiful in the world & a heart overflowing with joy & fulfillment. Things won’t change unless each one of us changes.My mini revolution comes in product reviews & through other interesting mediums, but I pray that the planet will be better when I leave & when I got here.

  4. *** 1 Year Review Update ***I decided to keep the system. After a few firmware updates and once TP-Link fixed the AP only mode such that the main and guest networks are truly separated I switched over from using it as a router to an AP solution. It has worked flawlessly since and without any performance degradation’s.I still do not like the app-centric approach for “management” (cannot call it that honestly); insight would probably be more appropriate. But, I will be moving in the future to an enterprise grade solution (this solution purchase has just been a stop-gap until that time and I finalize my network architecture). For the average home consumer that is not very tech-savvy (which is the audience this product really targets) it is overall very simple to get up and running with very few issues, especially at this price point.I have submitted over a dozen feature requests to TP-Link and almost all of them have been discarded by the manufacturer (but at least acknowledged); of the ones that were “accepted” they were very trivial.As of today, Sep 21 20201, the system via the app is no longer able to check for updates (it receives an error). I believe this is not due to the units themselves but instead TP-Link’s update portal that the units use to check for updates. Checking on the main site reveals an update published on July 15 2021 (S4 2.0_en_1.5.0 Build 20210607 Rel. 56436_US_EU_AU_JP_up.bin) that is available which is one update newer than my currently applied firmware published on September 30 2020 (S4 2.0_en_1.4.3 Build 20200918 Rel. 77820_US_EU_AU_JP_up.bin). Looks like I will have to update the units manually using the download links provided by TP-Link and by logging into the web UI (note: each unit will have its own web UI but one – the master – will show a different one by showing you the topology of the mesh; a manual firmward update can be applied using that unit).= SummaryOverall this is a great product. It definitely addresses the WiFi coverage in our new home. It has only been a few days since I set them up. However, a star in my rating had to be knocked off which will become evident shortly. I may update this review after some more time has passed. But it is currently appearing I might be returning this.I operate these in access point mode and not router mode. I have a better router than what these units provide and do not need double NAT’ing on my house wide network. That, and, I will be replacing the house wide router with a substantially better one anyway in the coming months.This review, however, covers my utilization and experience in both modes. Also note that I am an IT professional and deal with network infrastructure (along with many other things) day to day for over 20 years.In this review the term “satellite” is used to denote a Deco unit that is not the main Deco unit.I have intentionally saved the worst points of my review as the last section.= Topology SetupI have fiber to the premise gateway, still with the gateways’ Wi-Fi fully enabled on both 2.4Ghz and 5Ghz bands. My home is over 2,650 sqft, single story, built this year, with gigabit Cat5e cables to each room the Deco S4 units are situated. All Deco units use the Ethernet backhaul. All Cat5e runs and cables have been tested to support gigabit speeds point-to-point (with of course the obligatory TCP/IP overhead). Placement wise each of the Deco units are almost in a straight line, a function of my floor plan and where I need Wi-Fi coverage the most. Relative distances between Deco units:- 25 linear feet between first satellite and second, main Deco unit with one interior door between. This I refer to as satellite 1.- 45 linear feet between second satellite and main Deco unit with 3 interior only walls between. This I refer to as satellite 2.= PerformanceThe throughput performance on these is fantastic, especially at the price point. I have fiber gigabit Internet service. I use speedtest.net for all bench marks. I get the following throughput on a Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (US), stock firmware, latest software and security patches. Distance is always the distance between my test device and a specific Deco unit and with line of sight between the test device and the target Deco unit.| Deco | Distance | Downstream | Upstream |Satellite 1 | 1 ft | 344 | 392 |Main | 1 ft | 446 | 389 |Satellite 2 | 1 ft | 460 | 392 |Satellite 1 | 3 ft | 279 | 422 |Main | 3 ft | 485 | 409 |Satellite 2 | 3 ft | 392 | 383 |Satellite 1 | 6 ft | 355 | 350 |Main | 6 ft | 477 | 390 |Satellite 2 | 6 ft | 483 | 461 |Satellite 1 | 9 ft | 361 | 475 |Main | 9 ft | 482 | 374 |Satellite 2 | 9 ft | 477 | 466 |Satellite 1 | 12 ft | 385 | 460 |Main | 12 ft | 451 | 458 |Satellite 2 | 12 ft | 501 | 528 |Satellite 1 | 15 ft | 445 | 389 |Main | 15 ft | 461 | 453 |Satellite 2 | 15 ft | 500 | 432 |A 15 foot distance between a Deco unit and a connected device is most likely acceptable considering average housing room sizes. However, in my house floor plan, I have an easy 25 foot line of sight from the main Deco unit to where I did a test. Results came in as 251 Mbps downstream and 117 Mbps upstream. Still, highly acceptable. At my maximum floor plan range to that same Deco unit and still maintaining line of sight of 33 feet I wind up getting an unexpectedly impressive 493 Mbps downstream and 388 Mbps upstream. While I cannot check in the app to see specifically which Deco unit my test device was connected to due to either app or overall product system issues, I am left with only one avenue of explanation: the Deco system has successfully performed link aggregation for my test device. If, in the first place, I am correct in this very poor conclusion due to the lack of data, then, this is indeed impressive and can very well be THE single most discriminator in overall product performance vs issues vs cost.I realize these performance tests are not representative of real world scenarios. Fact is, most people do not go to such lengths to test their products and relevant environments, much less describe their environments.When a little more time goes by I will update this review with more realistic real world performance tests in terms of longer distances and obstructions.= The GoodI do not need parental controls, so, access point mode removes that for me, thankfully. Because I operate this in access point mode not having quality of service on the Deco’s is just fine as is not having DHCP handled by the Deco’s. Again, my current infrastructure handles all of these elegantly and more than sufficiently.In order to get a proper pass off while going from one end of the house to the other I had to enable fast roaming. Without enabling this resulting in unbearably long hand offs from one unit to the other based on proximity to units. The net result of this was severe performance degradation. This seems to work without issue and solved the hand off issue.The app is straightforward to use and easy to understand, ranging from initial installation to adding additional Deco’s to day to day activities. The app also provides notifications of new devices when they are added to / detected on the network (both in router and access point modes).As expected you can define a main Wi-Fi network and a guest network. This is standard fare. You can select if you want both 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands active or be more selective. Again, this is standard fare.You can rename connected devices in the app. Useful especially when connected devices do not allow you to set their DHCP host name. The units try to profile a connected device type (e.g., Phone, PC, etc) in which the result of this is also easily accessible via the app. But, when it cannot or gets it wrong you can override this in the app, very useful feature indeed. The app will also show you basic information such as allocated IP address, MAC address (wish it was in colon delimited notation and not hypen as the former is the standard representation for MAC addresses), connection type (main or guest network and frequency band) and which Deco unit the device is currently linked to.Unfortunately you cannot get the same level of information regarding devices connected to the guest network. Having visibility into this is just as important to give you another data point in your connected IoT devices. Oh, yeah, I suppose that people visiting your home is good too. Regardless, it is utterly unclear whether or not connected devices on the guest network have visibility to one another (e.g., can see each other), and much less have any reach into the main Wi-Fi or rest of your network. At a minimum, the default of any guest Wi-Fi network should be nothing can see anything else on the guest Wi-Fi , cannot see the main Wi-Fi, cannot see the rest of your network and can only see the Internet.Any Deco unit can serve as the main. In router mode, this means that the main unit has routing capabilities. Likewise, a different unit can be specified as the main via the app.= The BadThere is no white listing of devices, only a black list. Security best practice is white listing devices that are authorized for access. Having only a black list is unacceptable. It is on this ground alone these units may very well be returned. It escapes me why TP-Link would fail to include the ability to white list. Since this product seems to be targeted to the less network technologically bound than myself I can understand why only a black list is available (to prevent the less technologically adept folks from effectively locking themselves out). However, not including a white list capability does an injustice to everyone and is, security wise, shameful and puts consumers’ home networks at additional unnecessary risk of exploitation. Yes, using a white list to winds up meaning having to go through a little more trouble to allow a new device onto the network. For me, and every other IT security professional out there, white listing is an essential tool in the security posture arsenal and is one that should never be omitted.The only firmware release is the initial firmware release: Deco S4(US)_V2_191023 from December 25, 2019 (TP-Link support site). In the Deco app it reports no new updates for the firmware with a current version of 1.1.5 Build 20191023 Rel. 67285. Unzipping the firmware release on the support site shows the same firmware version as the app shows (specifically: S4 2.0_en_1.1.5 Build 20191023 Rel. 67285_US_EU_AU_JP_up.bin). Half a year later I would expect at least an additional firmware release. While not having any could be a good thing, generally, this is never the case. There are always bugs and vulnerabilities in every piece of software, and, firmware is no exception. Clearly a firmware update is needed at least to add a white list feature.There is a barely usable web UI for the Deco’s beyond that of just using the Deco app. I have found a landing page for each Deco connected to my router via the IP assigned to each. All UI’s require authentication. The UI is different depending on which Deco you connect to. The Deco’s that are not the main Deco provide the following features: update the firmware, pull the system log or reboot. Accessing the system log allows you to save it, email it or clear it. In contrast, connecting to the UI for the main Deco yields a subset of the features compared to the app but adds visibility into the units’ CPU and memory usage. Said subset of features are mainly read only via the interface, again, not very useful. Thus there is no real point in using anything but the app if one is looking for access to more robust features.Connected device presence status (online / offline) is wholly inaccurate as reported by the app. The only connected devices that are accurately reported for presence are those that have not left the Wi-Fi range and not power cycled. For example, all of my Fire TV sticks show as being online but all mobile devices that left the Wi-Fi range now show as offline despite being back within Wi-Fi range of the units for several hours. Even manually refreshing the view still yields in the app reporting these same mobile devices as being offline. More testing still needs to be performed, but, there is no reason why the device list status page in the app is this inaccurate.Bandwidth utilization by connected device in the device list is great to have. The only problem is that it too is completely inaccurate to the same degree as mentioned previously regarding connected device presence status. For those devices that actually show as being online the bandwidth utilization shown in this same view is always 0Kbps up and downstream. Since installation of the units I have yet to see this populated and have seen, once, and only once, a single connected device bandwidth utilization being reported if I select the said device in the list.There is no ability to perform a wireless site survey.There is no ability to use 802.11x.From a network management perspective there is no way to rename a specific Deco in terms of the host name that it will present to the rest of your network. All units show up simply as “deco-S4” from DHCP. Not useful.There is no way to designate the guest network LAN IP address range.= The UglyInitial set up was in router mode, the default. Setup of main and satellite 1 Deco’s went flawlessly and took but a few minutes per. Meanwhile, satellite 2 refuses to join the mesh in router mode and always leaves me staring at a red blinking light. The app reports “Unable to add these Decos” and “Move these Decos closer to a Deco that you’ve already set up, then tap TRY AGAIN.” Why would anyone have to move a Deco unit closer to another? They have an Ethernet backhaul, and by definition, can communicate with each other!Meanwhile, the engineer within me takes a different stance: while all Deco units indeed have a gigabit Ethernet backhaul each unit must be able to verify a minimal Wi-Fi signal level from its closest neighbor. And, since I am a customer facing type of person that voice inside of me would scream: in order to assure the best possible experience please ensure all Deco units have no physical obstructions between them and that none are surrounded by things that can block radio frequencies such as metal and concrete.Point is, I have yet to get all three Deco units online in router mode at all. It is NOT an option to bring any units closer together. Satellite 2 Deco has been power cycled and reset (via the reset button on the bottom of the unit) half a dozen times per with precisely the same results.Now, putting the system into access point mode results in a perfectly usable system without any of these problems. Wish I knew why. Regardless, this is a telltale sign to me of poor engineering. Of course, switching system modes from router to access point (or vice versa) results in the system rebooting all Deco’s. The majority of most modern residential Wi-Fi capable routers do not require a reboot when making this change.This is so problematic that it is cause, alone, for me to return the product.

  5. When you are considering spending almost 300 bucks for a router, and there are so many brands and models of them trying to lure your attention, you need to have some real facts. And that doesn’t mean reading about how fast or slow it is in somebody else’s house. Who cares? You don’t live in their house and every single thing you have connected to wifi and Ethernet in your home is different from someone else who is no more of an expert on routers than anyone else. Before I give you some real life facts I will get right to the bottom line and that is there is only ONE way you will ever know how a device like this can and will perform in your home and that is to buy it and try it with your own computers, laptops, tablets, smartphones, TV and everything else that is common in today’s home place. Remember, if it doesn’t work you can always send it back and get something else. And with this device you may end up doing that. On the other hand, this might be just what you’re looking for.WHAT IS ITOkay I’ve called it a router, a term the maker is trying to avoid. And that’s not a bad thing because eero isn’t exactly like 95% of the other routers out there. It’s important to know a few things about them. Other than Eero being a common Estonian and Finnish first name, they are a company founded by a couple of dudes in their apartment in 2016 and then bought up by Amazon in 2019. If you are reading all those reviews posted prior to the November 23, 2020 ship date of this new model eero 6 you are probably reading about old obsolete products and you should stop reading those right now. This is not the same item. Same concept yes but what’s inside is night and day different. Under its new owners the game plan here is that this device should be two things – Simple and Safe. To that end they have done some remarkable things I’ve never seen before and some things that maybe aren’t so stellar. What am I basing that on? I’ve been in the industry for a quite a while now and part of that included hands on installing and using at least two dozen current model routers that I bought with my own money and are sitting in my storage room. The word simple isn’t one that usually comes to mind when talking about these things, in fact it can be the exact opposite. Unfortunately a lot of these devices are either made by old line networking companies that don’t get what life is like in the first quarter of the twenty-first century or by offshore companies who do well at making stuff but not so well designing it for real life needs. The other word, safe, isn’t normally associated with routers either – usually that’s a function of the computer or smartphone and not needed for non-smart devices. In today’s world there is some logic in nipping unsafe bad stuff before it even gets into the air in your home, which is why eero has gone to great lengths to build protection right into their hardware.WHAT I LIKEFirst off please realize that this page has changed a few times to correspond to different configurations they are making available and the one I evaluated was a prerelease sample of the basic model 6 (not the Pro) which included the main base unit and two satellite units. That’s pretty much all you get other than the power transformers and a tiny card that tells you that you have to download an app to set the thing up. There is no other way to set it up other than downloading their app , which is one of the first differences from what you may be used to. The setup process can go pretty fast, that is it would have been fast if they would have included better instructions, a topic I will touch on later. Unlike the old days the setup is almost completely hands off, the hardware configures almost everything automatically and hardly asks you anything. In other words you do not have to go through that tedious process of updating the software and firmware, it’s all done for you. After a few minutes you are up and running and if you wanted to you could walk away and never touch it again. There is one solitary status light that glows a few different colors then settles down to a soft white all’s well indicator and you can turn it off completely if you don’t like it. You can’t make a mistake plugging it in because other than the power cable there are two identical ports which are both self configuring Ethernet input output ports, you attach your modem to one and optionally a hard wired Ethernet device to the other, although most people will never use it. If you’re like me and have any devices that demand a hard wired configuration you can always add a switched Ethernet hub. After you’re done you can go back into the app and tweak some things but nowhere near as many as even the cheapest entry level wifi router you may have owned in the past. There are also some performance graphs that are simple and easy to understand and a heavy handed pitch for their safety and security upgrades.THEN THERE ARE THOSE THINGS I DIDN’T CARE FORI didn’t have any issues with the lack of customization this product offers, I think for the vast majority of homeowners it has everything we need. But there are some things that were frustrating. The first was the total lack of setup instructions included with the device. You get the three components (lacking any kind of protective wrap), the power cords and the tiny card that tells you to download the app. They even show a website address. But they don’t tell you that you absolutely must use a smartphone with an active cellular data line that meets certain specific criteria to use to install that app and use it for the setup. And the only way you will ever know any of that is AFTER you set the thing up and go into the obscure help section that consists of many thousands of pages. I tried using my iPad and got a message that it was doing something but it didn’t tell me what. After a half hour it finally timed out and said the installation failed but not a word about why. After I tried the only available option which was to try again and wasting another half hour I tried to contact tech support. No surprise, they don’t have phone support but their website promises instant response. I filled in the information and waited, and waited and waited and 24 hours later I still didn’t get an answer almost a week later. By then I had figured out on my own that maybe I should try using my smartphone and the installation took all of about five minutes. The problem here is that not everyone may have a brand new phone that meets their strict criteria and maybe this is being installed somewhere where the user doesn’t have a smartphone at all but wants wifi internet. The short answer is that you can’t do it, period.Frustration two comes in when the next thing is that they want to send you an email with a secret code to prove that it’s really you but the first time that process failed and I had to do it again.If you are protective of your privacy this may not be the product for you – unlike the majority of routers you have to give away a ton of private information and agree to just as many contracts and legal stuff just to use the hardware. I will never get how sending someone all my private information is helping them protect my privacy.Finally there’s the issue of the subscription service, and it’s no small issue at all. Like many other companies eero is looking to build a continuing revenue stream of having you pay to subscribe to all but the most basic of the so-called safety services you paid almost 300 bucks to get in the first place. I am very aware of the firewalls, virus protection and other safety hardware and software I have built into my computer and other devices and I will make my opinion clear right now that I don’t think I need anything their suite of services offers. In fact I know so. I read through it all (something one in a million people will do) and the vast majority of it is typical of the San Francisco penchant for someone in a windowless room deciding what is safe and moral for me to view, for example barring me from viewing anything that shows guns or violence – but yet they won’t answer why it’s okay for them to sell video games that require a router that are all about guns and violence. In fact their entire so-called Secure suite seems to be aimed at blocking everything I should have the good sense and choice to view or not view as I please.Fortunately I think you can use their hardware without paying a monthly subscription fee, right now I am sampling it so I can update this with more information later. Over and above that $30 annual basic suite they offer an advanced security suite that as far as I can see adds primarily the addition of Encrypt Me, iPassword and Malwarebytes for a whopping $99 a year subscription. My opinion is that most people choosing this product for simplicity’s sake would have little knowledge and thus little interest in a VPN app like Encrypt Me, would question the value of paying for a password manager when there are so many available for free, and the reality is most people’s devices are probably already protected by a very good antivirus program already. Note that I’ve used the word opinion a couple of times and I mean it, I’m not saying my opinion is what you should do any more than I am not saying a word about what internet speeds I’m getting in my home, because you shouldn’t care about my or anyone else’s speeds, they have no impact on you at all.SHOULD YOU BUYMy home is longer than it is wide and my wifi signal has to go through some mechanical equipment and a kitchen to get to my entertainment center, which has an adverse effect on the signal. In the other direction is my office which has a lot of walls between it and my router. I was getting ready to run a cable and hardwire both ends of the house to help solve this situation but this seemed like an easier solution – now I have one extender at one end of the house right next to the TV and the other in close proximity to my office equipment, much of which is wireless. I tried the previous products that used an extender you plugged into a wall outlet and they don’t work for me. They did in the old days when our devices stayed static but when I walked from one end of the house to the other with my phone I had to log out of one account and log in to another to continue. With eero everything is seamless, the extenders smartly and automatically connect to wireless devices and when a device travels it hands off from one extended to another without a glitch. While I am very technical I don’t like to overcomplicate things and I found the setup and configuration of this product to be amazingly simple. I don’t think the people in SF are on the same page as the rest of the country in terms of what their privacy needs are and what they feel they should be told they should be protected from so I’m leaning right now toward not continuing with their Secure subscription after the 30 day trial, which by the way I think is too short for anyone to make a useful decision on. I can’t tell you if you should buy this or not, but I hope this information has helpful. And if this sounds like it’s right for you I encourage you to try it and not be talked out of it because someone else didn’t like it. Good luck, I will give this an update after a month or two – no review for such a product can be very useful a few days after it’s introduced, mine has already updated itself three times in the 24 hours I’ve had it.

  6. I have an approximately 2,000 square foot house. My main router has to be on one end of the house on the top floor. Before the Eero, this always meant I had to live with some dead zones within my living area, mainly at the opposite end of my house and on the deck behind our house. The Eero’s wireless mesh network is able to deliver WiFi to a much larger area of my house than a single router could, and did not require me to drill holes in my wall to hard-wire something. It does so at the expense of network speed for the devices that connect to the satellite Eeros, rather than to the main one. That seems like a fair trade-off to me, however, because network speeds are fast enough for me, and because most of the areas where speed is lower are the areas that I either had spotty WiFi connections, or no WiFi connections, before I had a mesh wireless system.#### Comparison with my old routerMy old router was a tri-band 802.11ac router that cost about as much as the Eero 6 3-pack. In many respects, it was an excellent router. It was fast and offered very good coverage throughout the house, but its reach did not cover my entire living area. (Note: The Eero 6 is a WiFi 6-capable device, but I am currently running all devices on 802.11ac or older WiFi specifications. I expect to get WiFi 6-enabled devices next year, and I know my network will be ready for them.)The regular (non-“Pro”) Eero 6 system is designed for homes with internet speeds of up to 500Mbps. I currently have a 400Mbps connection. Before and after upgrading my router, I ran a bunch of speed tests throughout my house. With my old router, I maxed out my internet connection in about half the house, but had much lower speed further out, and the connection dropped to nothing or almost nothing at the side of the house opposite my router, and outside on my deck. With the Eero, speed tests are up to 400Mbps for devices connected to the main Eero unit, and up to 200Mbps (and down to 40Mbps) for devices that connect to one of the two satellite units. The coverage area is much larger, however.The Eero is just as fast as my old router in the same room that the main Eero base unit is in. In other rooms of the house, where the Eero is obstructed by multiple walls, or is wirelessly hopping from on Eero to another, my average speeds are half that (200 Mbit) or one tenth that (40 Mbit). The thing is, even when the speed is compromised (due, I suppose, to the connection hopping between the Eero devices) the WiFi is still fast enough for what I use it for: video and audio streaming and the web. I can actually use my iPhone and my computer in the backyard, with Internet speeds that are fast enough for streaming video and music, so, in a sense, that is a 100% improvement over what I had before.In my household, we have at least twenty wireless devices connected to the Eero at any time, in addition to five hardwired computers, including a home media server/NAS. We stream video, audio, and do video conferencing much of the day. There are a lot of packets going through my network, and the Eero has routed and transmitted them without a hitch.#### The hardwareAll three Eero units are identical in appearance, though only the base unit has Ethernet jacks. They are much smaller than any home router I have had before, and look completely unobtrusive. They are designed with a slanted and sloped top, to discourage you from putting anything on top of them. They cannot be wall mounted without some kind of bracket, which is not included. I found the design to be a little more limiting than I had expected, because I had to found tabletops to place each unit on; I couldn’t place them in hallway outlets like the Eero Beacon.The “main” Eero unit is a router, but, unlike most home routers, it does not contain a built-in switch. That means that you can connect one, and only one, device to it via Ethernet. If you connect several devices to your current router via Ethernet, you have two options with Eero: either (1) run the Eero in bridge mode, using your old router to route packets, or (2) buy a relatively inexpensive unmanaged switch to sit beside the Eero base unit, and connect your hardwired devices to that. I chose the second approach because I already had a switch.In the past, many of my WiFi routers have “flaked out” after a while, probably because they get too hot for too long. I noticed that the main Eero unit gets warm, but not hot, to the touch, but only toward the bottom, where the circuit board is. I don’t think it gets warm enough to “fry” the electronics eventually; I certainly hope not.#### The iOS AppI knew, from heading ads for Eero on podcasts, that Eero has an smartphone app for administrating and monitoring the network. I did not know that using such an app was the _only_ way to administer the network. I am a home networking nerd, very familiar with the web-based admin tools of numerous brands of home routers, including open source firmwares such as DD-WRT and Tomato—so this actually tripped me up when I was trying to re-create the static IP addresses of my NAS and app server. I assumed I could log into the admin page of the router, find out what IP address those devices ended up at, and then log into them over the network. I have found that wired devices do not always show up in the connected devices list in the iOS app. This can make it hard to find what IP address they are connected to.I use the iOS app, which is attractive and pretty easy to use. You should know that you tap the top section of the “Home” tab of the Eero app to see all your Eero devices and manage them—it isn’t immediately obvious. Setting up the Eero system from the app was simple, and the app lets you monitor your network, and turn off the light on top of each Eero if you want.Unlike almost every router I have ever used, the Eero’s default IP range (at least in my case) is 192.168.4.0/24. The “.4” part surprised me, and required me to update some devices that had fixed IP addresses in the 192.168.1.0/24 range.#### Eero SecureThe Eero comes with a free, 30-day trial for Eero Secure. It is an optional service that may be useful to you. I don’t plan to subscribe because I already have a similar service that I am happy with. I could see it being useful, however, especially due to the tight integration with the Eero app and Eero hardware.

  7. Long review but hopefully helpful:Bought this to replace an aged Airport Extreme and give my Oculus Quest 2 a better WiFi connection. So far so good.Set up was okay but I had some trouble getting the Ethernet light to go green despite all the others being green and I was unable to get online via wired or wireless connection. If you reboot your modem and this device, go make coffee or something when it is starting back up because the router takes a while to restart. The light finally went green but it did feel like it took an inordinate amount of time.I understand the frustration that comes with setting up these new things and the rage factor sometimes enters the picture. If it does: unplug the cable modem and the router, leave everything unplugged for 5 minutes, plug in the cable modem and wait until it is fully booted up, plug in this router and walk away for a bit. Give it 5-10 minutes and hopefully you’ll be good to go.The interface looks a bit dated and clonky but most do. Seems the least priority is given to creating a clean, attractive interface for all these things, but coming from an Airport Extreme where you have essentially no features to work with, this is a dream. The ability to edit the names of the clients is something I was never able to do before and it really makes a difference.I wanted something with the ability to kick clients off the network while I am using the Quest to ensure it has no bandwidth competition with devices that are not in use at the time the Quest is being used, but then put them back on without having to jump through hoops, re-entering passwords and such. I have a lot of devices on my network and while they may not be in use, they are still hovering around and eating up some bandwidth even while idling.This router allows that in an easy peasy way but the icons used are confusing. First, if you go to the Network map, clients section, you will see a list of all the clients on your network. You can click the pencil next to the name of the device and change it to make life easier. On the right side, if you click Block, that client gets blacklisted and cannot connect to the network. If you click View Blacklist, you will see all of the blocked clients and there is a garbage can icon on the right. This is a confusing and poor icon choice because most people would think that this will remove the client entirely. It doesn’t. It simply puts the client back on the whitelist. It’s a great thing to have, for example:Let’s say you have a Zoom meeting and want to ensure that there’s as little connection issues as possible. You can block all other clients on the network that are not needed and have all the bandwidth to yourself for your meeting and when it’s over, just click the garbage can on each device in the blacklist and poof! they are all able to connect again.I am not really understanding the point of the QoS feature on this device because in the past when I’ve set up QoS in a work environment, you are able to directly allocate bandwidth to devices. Ideally, this would be what you would use if you had a Zoom call rather than kicking clients off for a time. With this router’s QoS, you have two choices: On or Off. Each device listed has a Priority switch that is turned on or off. You can turn on the Priority switch for one, some or all devices, but there’s nothing else, so you have no idea how bandwidth allocation is implemented here.Under the On/Off switch for QoS, there is a bandwidth allocation box for both upload and download with each set at 1000. You can change this number, but again, it doesn’t tell you how it will divvy out that bandwidth to the clients. If you only have one device with the Priority turned on, you are left to wonder what that client is getting as opposed to other devices on the network. That’s kind of a shame because you can prioritize a device for Always or for a couple of hours. Would seem the perfect set up for a Zoom meeting as you can give Priority to your device for a set amount of time and the router will release that restriction at the end of the hour or two or whatever you chose without you having to interact with the admin page at all. Unfortunately, you cannot enter times: i.e,. Priority from 10 a.m. to noon. You can choose Always, 1 hour, 2 hours, or 4 hours.I’m not sure what people are talking about regarding monthly fees for Parent Controls. I don’t have kids, but opened it up and you can add a child’s computer as a device, block certain keywords from being searched online and limit the days/times that your child can get online. I didn’t see anything about fees or payment for those features.I have noticed more zip in my Quest 2 since setting up this router and am quite pleased with it so far. I set up a 5ghz network set to AX only for the Quest’s exclusive use, a 2.4ghz Guest Network for all the Echos, Kindles, switches for lights, etc., and a 2.4ghz network for laptops, iPads, etc.

  8. I bought the MR9600 (aka AX6000) before Christmas while it was at 1/2 off the list price. Although there has been a steep learning curve at times, for that price I’m happy with it. Full price, though? I couldn’t see paying that at this point. It’s a first generation WiFi6 router that, imo, still has some kinks left to work out.What I like:- Better range than my old AC1750 router. In our 2 story house of about 3000sf, we have the router downstairs on one corner of the house with the master bedroom in the upstairs on the opposite corner of the house. The old router couldn’t even push the 5GHz network up there, and the 2.4GHz network would usually only get about 20-30 Mbps speed. This AX6000, on the other hand, can pull 150 Mbps on 5GHz in the same location scenario. One of my motives in buying the AX6000 was in it’s mesh capability, thinking that I might want to put in some nodes eventually to extend coverage, but with the new router it really just isn’t necessary.- I wanted to like the 5GHz/2.4GHz integration (i.e. as configured out of the box you only see one network being broadcast). The router automatically evaluates the connection and switches to the better band (5GHz for best speed, if you are closer, but drops to 2.4GHz for better range if you are too far away). However see the negatives list below for the downside of this feature.What I don’t like:- The first big issue I had was routine dropping of older devices from the network. The main culprits being a number of home automation wall plugs and a wifi printer. They would all see the network just fine and set up and operate initially, but within a few hours of first setting up they would drop from the network and not re-connect with anything short of a full setup from scratch again.As noted in many other reviews of this unit that issue was solved by separating out the two bands, which negates the integrated band functionality I previously mentioned I wanted to like. If your wifi needs consist only of newer, higher end devices such as phones and computers then this probably won’t be necessary.I, at least, had a hard time figuring out how to split the networks since the router setup app doesn’t have a button or anything obvious to automate that. I felt a little dumb when I realized all you have to do is enter a different name for one of the two bands in the router setup and hit save. After that all my devices that wouldn’t stay connected previously have now been running fine for many weeks on the dedicated 2.4GHz network, including through many cycles of router’s power.- Device prioritization and the routers internal speed test app: This one got pretty wonky for me. The router has an internal speed test app that can be accessed from the routers Admin menu. I had understood that this was the “trunk speed”, i.e. that it measured the full bandwidth available to the router, which would then be apportioned to the myriad of devices connected to the router. Each device then would have a speed test result of something less than the router’s speed test. However after upgrading my internet service to 1Gbps down/35Mbps up, I kept still seeing 11Mbps up speeds, unchanged from my previous plan’s speed test result. (Download speeds were within expectations.) I tried everything I could think of, and finally called the ISP. They claimed my service had been upgraded and it must be my equipment’s fault. Finally I got a technician visit. On his specialty equipment he showed full speeds from my modem, but wildly different results when connected to the router. One speed test site would report 40Mbps upload while 3 others would report 1Mbps upload, or sometimes 11Mbps. To his credit, after he left our house the tech came back about 15 minutes later. He’d been searching forum reviews on his phone apparently and found someone who mentioned Device Prioritization as a source of a similar issue for this router. Sure enough, one click of the off button for Device Prioritization and my router’s speed test app was reporting full plan upload speeds. Weirdly, though, after turning Device Prioritization back on, the router continued to report full speeds. What’s more, speed tests run from our cell phones (which are not on the Prioritized list) ALSO now reported full plan upload speeds.- One other hitch to mention: Older 802.11AC wifi cards might not be able to see this router network at all if they don’t have up to date drivers. My work laptop was one such case, but once I got my IT dept to finally update the 3 year old wifi driver they now work together just fine. I have had no other cases of any device having a problem connecting to the AX6000.

  9. Reply
    MyProductPortraits May 18, 2021 at 12:00 am

    The TP-Link AX5400 is a WiFi 6 router with dual band and long range wireless capabilities. Also known as the Archer AX73, the WiFi 6 technology allows this product to achieve speeds up to 5400 Mbps as a theoretical maximum. Even though actual speeds will probably be lower than that, it will still be fast enough to perform bandwidth demanding tasks such as large file transfers over the network or Ultra High Definition streaming on your local home network.Installation is super easy, it’s basically plug and play. You connect the router to your internet modem, and then connect your devices via the WiFi networks. The A5400 will come with default wireless settings, including a predefined network name and password, for easy initial setup. It is strongly recommended to change these settings to your own, for security reasons. Management can be done either via the smartphone app or (very happy about this one) the web interface. More about that later.Aesthetically, you will notice that this router has a rather interesting rectangular design, and it is equipped with 6 (!!!) antennas. Yes, you read that right: 6 antennas. TP-Link claims that this supports large wifi coverage and good signal strength to all devices with their beamforming and 4T4R technologies. Even though I have no practical way of measuring the performance of these technologies, I can attest to the fact that the AX5400’s coverage is excellent and I didn’t notice any dead spots at home (including the devices located outside my home, such as wifi cameras and doorbells). In case you do experience dead spots, you can add an extra TP-Link mesh device compatible with the AX5400 to solve the issue. I talk more about mesh networking below.One of the major features of the AX5400 is mesh networking. Mesh means that all your routers connect with each other, forming a mesh of coverage rather than having one router that acts as a single point of connection. Your wireless device will always connect automatically to the mesh router that provides the strongest signal. This is called Roaming. Much like in telecom/mobile networks, your Wi-Fi devices might change positions and move around your house. This means that the wireless signal between your device and the router gets weaker with distance. With mesh routers your device will automatically connect to a different router unit that offers a stronger signal, without interrupting the running service and streams. This not only increases the coverage vastly, but also offers seamless handovers and transitions of Wi-Fi services as you change your position in your house. In other words, you get Wi-Fi Roaming capabilities that will vastly improve the reliability of your wireless connection. That, of course, means that you need another TP-Link mesh capable device to achieve this functionality. TP-Link provides a list of mesh devices compatible with the AX5400 on their website.So far I have no complains regarding the AX5400’s performance. The Wi-Fi is very quick and outperforms my internet connection. I haven’t noticed any issues with latency either. One remark I want to make here is that, even though older WiFi cards will still be able to connect and operate with the AX5400, you will need a Wi-Fi 6 compatible wireless card to make the most out of the mesh system. Making the most out of it doesn’t mean that you will experience speeds close to 5.4 Gbps. These speeds are a theoretical maximum, they are achieved in the lab and they are impossible to see in the average home network setup. You will see, though, very high speeds depending on the quality of your wireless card (in my tests, I used the TP-Link WiFi 6 AX3000 PCIe WiFi Card), the distance from the router and the obstacles that separate you from it. Bottom line: it’ll be fast, but be realistic with your expectations.But probably one of the things I’m most happy about this router is the availability of a web interface for management. Being the owner/user of the otherwise great TP-Link Deco system, one of my main complaints was the lack of a web interface for network configuration. As a power user, I find it hard to configure my network equipment via the small screen of a smartphone. You can access the web interface by typing the router’s management IP (you can find it listed as Gateway on your computer’s network settings) in your browser. You’ll have to first set up a local password (or create an account with TP-Link) before accessing the router configuration.Once you log in, the first screen you’ll see is the home screen, or a summary screen if you like. You can see the internet status, the router status and some shortcut button to common functions, your mesh devices (if you have any) and the connected client devices. This last bit is quite interesting, since you’ll be able to see the connected devices, their real time speed (up/down), the interface they’re connected to (ethernet, 2.4G or 5G), their “negotiated” max bandwidth, how long they’ve been connected to the router and, finally, a “block” button to deny the device access to the network. Below, I’m going through some of the functions that I find interesting, but I will omit the ones that are so common you can find them virtually in every router out there.On the Wireless screen you’ll find your WiFi settings. You can turn on or off OFDMA, TWT, Smart Connect and, of course, the Wireless radio itself. OFDMA (simultaneous transmission to different devices within the same transmission window) will significantly increase the traffic speed with compatible devices (your device must support OFDMA), TWT will help increase your device’s battery life by maintaining the connection with the router and allowing the device to go to sleep (aka not forcing the device to send keep alive messages to the router too frequently), while Smart Connect optimized the connectivity of the router’s radio bands with the client devices.TP-Link offers a security platform with the AX5400, similar to what they offer with the rest of their flagship devices, HomeShield. The user will get some basic functionality out of the box, and additional sophisticated features and analytics are available with a subscription service.The last screen on the web interface is the Advanced screen, where all the advanced options are located. Power users will definitely appreciate some of these. The first thing that caught my eye was Lan —> Link Aggregation. You can aggregate (combine) up to two Ethernet ports into one (logical) network port, aggregating their bandwidth as well. Of course, you’ll need to aggregate ports on the other end of the connection as well, but that is the other side of the problem. Pretty cool. The router also supports direct DynDNS logins, for those of you who still use a DynDNS client on your computer. Another cool section is Routing. You can use your own static routes defined in the router’s config if you need to direct specific traffic to specific destinations. Use this only if you know what you’re doing, otherwise a bad routing config will probably block your access and traffic. The router comes with a USB port, which is nothing unusual. What is very cool, though, is the fact that the USB port supports (except for mass storage devices) Apple’s Time Machine. Just connect a storage device to the AX5400’s USB port, enable Time Machine in settings, and voila! No need for one of those old Apple AirPort Extreme routers anymore. NAT is, of course, present in this device as well, for your port forwarding needs. Security features include a Firewall, ACLs and MAC spoofing protection (by binding IPs to specific MACs). You have your standard VPN server built in, supporting both OpenVPN and PPTP, IPv6 support for you dual-stackers out there and a bunch of router Admin features (firmware update, backup, remote management, system logs etc.). Last but not least, you can switch the mode of the device between a Router (the device will route traffic and provide routing services) and an Access Point (the device will become a wireless gateway for clients, but you will need to connect it to a router for routing services – this is used mostly to expand the WiFi network).Overall the TP-Link AX5400 WiFi 6 router is a great home routing device and a strong contender in this segment of products. I’m very happy with it for the time I’ve been using it, and I definitely recommend it.

  10. I am a very senior citizen with limited computer experience. I had a 10 year old Archer C7 router that I wanted to replace with a new C7. I had a problem understanding the installation video so I contacted customer service to try to understand if there was a problem. I did a chat with customer service and then they sent me an e mail. I had further questions and my e mails were answered within hours. I did not exactly get an answer to my question, but that may be because I didn’t know enough terminology to frame it correctly. I was trying to find out what they meant in the instructions that said do not connect router to modem if there is another network on modem. My internet provider refers to the setting where I connect to the internet as a part of their network. So I was trying to find out if that connection to the modem was something I should worry about.I finally got an e mail saying that I should make sure that no other devices were connected to the modem. It took a while, but they kept trying. I was able to set up the router and used the quick setup guide at theTPLink web site. One problem I had was that the instructions and the web site did not really stress enough the need to go to the network setting of your internet provider, and connect to the internet there. ;On windows eleven the network settings are hidden, and when you click on the internet connection icon on the lower right hand part of the screen you don’t see the various settings. By settings I mean the place where you enter your router password and connect to your internet service provider. In earlier windows the setting appeared when you clicked on the internet icon. Now you have to hit a > icon on the menu to find the internet connections. The internet connection for the C7 is TP-Link_90C2. Once you connect there you have a seciure internet connection. My problem was that after I ran the quick install I got a message you can now use the internet, and I was connected to the internet. However it was not a stable connection, and I lost it twice before I figured out that I needed to go to the windows 11 icon and then to my internet providers connection to get a stable connection.I rate customer service very high for quickness of response and patience with new user in trying to help me understand the product. I rate the instructions as not so great. I rate my ability to read the instructions as poor. Maybe they pointed out the need for the internet connection on windows 11, but it wasn’t in big enough print or underlined enough for me to get it.The product is also very good once I got it set up. I am getting more speed than my internet provider says it is providing me. Maybe some of my neighbors mgh is coming into my apartment. I am still getting a slight bit of buffering in loading some web sites, but I don’t think this is a router problem. I don’t know because I cant use wifi analyzer with my c7. There is no way to pick your channels, you have to hope that the C7 does it correctly. Customer service patiently explained to me that I should relax, big brother router was going to solve it. Maybe so, but I still get some buffering. HOwever it is just on a few sites, and for a few seconds so i can live with it. Overall, i give the whole experience five stars, but the interface was a little confusing or maybe it was the instructions I should give four stars.

  11. Archer A7/AX21 2.4G speed for iPhone 11 from 300M Verizon Fios5* review for successfully resolved my low 2.4G speed problem, excellent support from TP Link and fast 5G speed that exceeds Verizon Fios max speed of 300Mbps.The purpose of this review is to compare the 2.4G and 5G speeds of the TP Link Archer A7(AC1700) WiFi 5 router and AX21(AX1800) WiFi 6 router using an iPhone 11 which supports WiFi 6. The highest speed I can test is 300Mbps limited by my Verizon Internet plan. Measurement results using show that using the WiFi 5 router, the 2.4G speed is 60M/80M (UL/DL) and the 5G speed is 307M/330M, whereas using the WiFi 6 router, the 2.4G speed is 110M/120M and the 5G speed is about same.Newer routers’ real life 5G speed is very high and normally is not a problem, but real life 2.4G speed could be slow. It is not entirely sure which part of the wireless link is limiting the 2.4G speed. Below examines the speed limit of the WiFi standards involved, the router and iPhone 11. The routers are TP Link’s Archer A7(AC1700) and AX21(AX1800). Measured speeds at 2.4G and 5G will also be given.Router (TP Link) Specs and Supported WiFi Standards1) Archer A7(AC1700) has has 3 antennas is a WiFi 5 router2.4G : 450Mbps5G: 1300M bpsSupported Standards: AX21(AX1800) : 802.11ac(Wi-Fi 5), 802.11b, 802.11ax(Wi-Fi 6), 802.11n(Wi-Fi 4), 802.11g802.11n, 802.11ac, 802.11ax are also called Wi-Fi 4, WiFi 5 and WiFi 6 respectively.2) AX21(AX1800) has 4 antennas is a WiFi 6 router2.4G: 574M bps5G: 1200M bps.Supported Standards: AX7 (AC1700) 802.11b, 802.11n, 802.11g, 802.11acA7 (AX1800) is a low cost ($60) popular (listed as “Amazon Choice”) WiFi 5 router which supports 802.11 ac whereas AX 21 is a low cost ($90) WiFi 6 router which supports 802.11 ax. WiFi 6 (max speed 9.6G) not only has higher speed than WiFi 5 (max speed 3.5G) but also can support more devices using orthogonal frequency division multiple access. The main differences are given in picture 1. (Picture 1 from : https://www.mwrf.com/technologies/systems/article/21849959/whats-the-difference-between-wifi-5-and-wifi-6)Comparing the specs of these two routers, one has a higher 2.4G speed while the other has a higher 5G speed. But in real life, according to my measurements, at 2.4G, the WiFi 6 router has almost twice the speed than the WiFi 5 router. I don’t have a high enough wireless speed plan to test the 5G speed. In my house both routers have the same speed of 310M, limited by the max speed allowed by Verizon Fios 300M.Speeds specified by the WiFi standards are speeds the router manufacturers trying to meet and they are not the limit, but speeds advertised by the router are the speeds that customers want the router to be able to reach. They become upset if they are unable to get the speeds advertised by the router.Routers often do not specified under what link conditions these seemingly advertised high speeds could be realized. For example what is the required bandwidth, the number of antennas (the so called MIMO) and how pure the signal has to be (the signal to noise ratio). Is the bandwidth 20, 40, 80 or 160M? Is the signal to noise ratio has to be greater than 10dB?In real life, link speed depends on how far from the router (the signal strength) and radio interference which falls in band (the signal to noise ratio). The former can be solved by doing the speed test right next to the router, where the transmit signal from the router is at maximum. But for the latter, unless one has a so called Faraday Cage, there is no way to block in-band interference especially at 2.4G, which are used by microwave ovens, Bluetooth and many household devices. Interference is hard to quantify without using a spectrum analyzer and could become an excuse if one calls the router support line complaining low speed.Another limit is the device itself, and in this case iPhone 11. It’s specs are given below.Wi-Fi specifications for iPhone 11802.11 standard, name, frequency Maximum PHY data rate Maximum channel bandwidth Maximum MCS index Maximum spatial streamsax@5 GHz 1200 Mbps 80 MHz 11 (HE) 2/MIMOac@5 GHz 866 Mbps 80 MHz 9 (VHT) 2/MIMOa/n@5 GHz 300 Mbps 40 MHz 7 (HT) 2/MIMOax@2.4 GHz 195 Mbps 20 MHz 9 (HE) 2/MIMOb/g/n@2.4 GHz 144 Mbps 20 MHz 7 (HT) 2/MIMO(From: https://support.apple.com/guide/deployment/iphone-wi-fi-specification-details-dep268652e6c/web)https://mcsindex.com gives more details about how the speed on each band is affected by modulation scheme, number of antennas, bandwidth and WiFi standards used, not only for iPhones but for routers as well.From the iPhone 11 specs, only “n” and “ax” support 2.4GHz if we ignore the older standards “b” and “g”. At 2.4G, The maximum speeds for “n” is 144M whereas for “ax” is 195M. The max bandwidth for both is 20MHz which needs to be set in the router. Setting the bandwidth to 40MHz could lower the speed as the noise power will be doubled.However, at 5GHz the speed for ac (WiFi 5) is 866M with 80M max bandwidth whereas for ax (WiFi 6) is 1200M also with 80M max bandwidth. These bandwidths should also be specified in the router. Setting the bandwidth too high or too low could lower the speed.From the iPhone 11 max speeds, it is clear that the wireless link’s speed is not limited by both the A7 and AX21 routers and the standards, but by the iPhone 11 at 2.4G and by Verizon Fios at 5G.I have Verizon Fios 300M download and upload. Initially, I used an A7, thinking that at 2.4GHz, the router speed is 450M which is higher than iPhone’s 144M(“n”) and 195M(“ax), surely shouldn’t be a problem. But speed test showed that I got only 60M download and 80M upload from the best channel and 20M bandwidth (I tested all the channels and bandwidth combinations).60M is too slow for me because I have several devices (such as security cameras) using 2.4G. So I called TP Link support line to see what I had done wrong. Most customer supports didn’t know what the problem was the and finally I was connected to a high level support. She said that in real life, I had to multiply the speed by 30-50% and guided me through the various specs of the wireless link. I don’t know where the 30-50% comes from, perhaps it was her empirical experience. If I use the average of 40% and assume that applies to the lower speed of the router and the iPhone, which is 144MHz. 40%x144M is 57M. This was about what I got at 2.4G using the A7 router.But she also said something about WiFi 6 router and got me thinking perhaps a WiFi 6 router could improve the speed. (I must say that I got excellent support from TP Link, I had gotten calls twice from the specialist unsolicited and many followup emails. All trying to help me solve the low speed problem.)I then change the A7(AC1700) to an AX21(AX1800), which does support WiFi 6 “ax”.The main advantage of using AX21 is that it raised the iPhone 11 max speed at 2.4G from 144M to 195M, a gain of 51M. And as a result, in real life, the 2.4G link speed seemed to have increased by about the same amount. Speed test showed that at 2.4G, I now got ~90-110M(download, previously 60M when using A7) and 100-120M(upload) with the channel and bandwidth set on auto. Though the download speed is still less than 195M, the link speed has increased by changing to a router that supports ax and has 4 antennas. Have no idea if a more expensive router will further increase the 2.4G speed.However, at 5GHz, both routers give 307M download and 330M upload, limited by Verizon Fios max speed of 300M.When doing speed test, I shut off all 2.4G emitters. I live in a rural area and I suspect there is little interference.A7 has 3 antennas whereas AX21 has four. Is the speed improvement at 2.4G due to the additional antenna or the support of WiFi 6 or both?

  12. Archer A7/AX21 2.4G speed for iPhone 11 from 300M Verizon Fios5* review for successfully resolved my low 2.4G speed problem, excellent support from TP Link and fast 5G speed that exceeds Verizon Fios max speed of 300Mbps.The purpose of this review is to compare the 2.4G and 5G speeds of the TP Link Archer A7(AC1700) WiFi 5 router and AX21(AX1800) WiFi 6 router using an iPhone 11 which supports WiFi 6. The highest speed I can test is 300Mbps limited by my Verizon Internet plan. Measurement results using show that using the WiFi 5 router, the 2.4G speed is 60M/80M (UL/DL) and the 5G speed is 307M/330M, whereas using the WiFi 6 router, the 2.4G speed is 110M/120M and the 5G speed is about same.Newer routers’ real life 5G speed is very high and normally is not a problem, but real life 2.4G speed could be slow. It is not entirely sure which part of the wireless link is limiting the 2.4G speed. Below examines the speed limit of the WiFi standards involved, the router and iPhone 11. The routers are TP Link’s Archer A7(AC1700) and AX21(AX1800). Measured speeds at 2.4G and 5G will also be given.Router (TP Link) Specs and Supported WiFi Standards1) Archer A7(AC1700) has has 3 antennas is a WiFi 5 router2.4G : 450Mbps5G: 1300M bpsSupported Standards: AX21(AX1800) : 802.11ac(Wi-Fi 5), 802.11b, 802.11ax(Wi-Fi 6), 802.11n(Wi-Fi 4), 802.11g802.11n, 802.11ac, 802.11ax are also called Wi-Fi 4, WiFi 5 and WiFi 6 respectively.2) AX21(AX1800) has 4 antennas is a WiFi 6 router2.4G: 574M bps5G: 1200M bps.Supported Standards: AX7 (AC1700) 802.11b, 802.11n, 802.11g, 802.11acA7 (AX1800) is a low cost ($60) popular (listed as “Amazon Choice”) WiFi 5 router which supports 802.11 ac whereas AX 21 is a low cost ($90) WiFi 6 router which supports 802.11 ax. WiFi 6 (max speed 9.6G) not only has higher speed than WiFi 5 (max speed 3.5G) but also can support more devices using orthogonal frequency division multiple access. The main differences are given in picture 1. (Picture 1 from : https://www.mwrf.com/technologies/systems/article/21849959/whats-the-difference-between-wifi-5-and-wifi-6)Comparing the specs of these two routers, one has a higher 2.4G speed while the other has a higher 5G speed. But in real life, according to my measurements, at 2.4G, the WiFi 6 router has almost twice the speed than the WiFi 5 router. I don’t have a high enough wireless speed plan to test the 5G speed. In my house both routers have the same speed of 310M, limited by the max speed allowed by Verizon Fios 300M.Speeds specified by the WiFi standards are speeds the router manufacturers trying to meet and they are not the limit, but speeds advertised by the router are the speeds that customers want the router to be able to reach. They become upset if they are unable to get the speeds advertised by the router.Routers often do not specified under what link conditions these seemingly advertised high speeds could be realized. For example what is the required bandwidth, the number of antennas (the so called MIMO) and how pure the signal has to be (the signal to noise ratio). Is the bandwidth 20, 40, 80 or 160M? Is the signal to noise ratio has to be greater than 10dB?In real life, link speed depends on how far from the router (the signal strength) and radio interference which falls in band (the signal to noise ratio). The former can be solved by doing the speed test right next to the router, where the transmit signal from the router is at maximum. But for the latter, unless one has a so called Faraday Cage, there is no way to block in-band interference especially at 2.4G, which are used by microwave ovens, Bluetooth and many household devices. Interference is hard to quantify without using a spectrum analyzer and could become an excuse if one calls the router support line complaining low speed.Another limit is the device itself, and in this case iPhone 11. It’s specs are given below.Wi-Fi specifications for iPhone 11802.11 standard, name, frequency Maximum PHY data rate Maximum channel bandwidth Maximum MCS index Maximum spatial streamsax@5 GHz 1200 Mbps 80 MHz 11 (HE) 2/MIMOac@5 GHz 866 Mbps 80 MHz 9 (VHT) 2/MIMOa/n@5 GHz 300 Mbps 40 MHz 7 (HT) 2/MIMOax@2.4 GHz 195 Mbps 20 MHz 9 (HE) 2/MIMOb/g/n@2.4 GHz 144 Mbps 20 MHz 7 (HT) 2/MIMO(From: https://support.apple.com/guide/deployment/iphone-wi-fi-specification-details-dep268652e6c/web)https://mcsindex.com gives more details about how the speed on each band is affected by modulation scheme, number of antennas, bandwidth and WiFi standards used, not only for iPhones but for routers as well.From the iPhone 11 specs, only “n” and “ax” support 2.4GHz if we ignore the older standards “b” and “g”. At 2.4G, The maximum speeds for “n” is 144M whereas for “ax” is 195M. The max bandwidth for both is 20MHz which needs to be set in the router. Setting the bandwidth to 40MHz could lower the speed as the noise power will be doubled.However, at 5GHz the speed for ac (WiFi 5) is 866M with 80M max bandwidth whereas for ax (WiFi 6) is 1200M also with 80M max bandwidth. These bandwidths should also be specified in the router. Setting the bandwidth too high or too low could lower the speed.From the iPhone 11 max speeds, it is clear that the wireless link’s speed is not limited by both the A7 and AX21 routers and the standards, but by the iPhone 11 at 2.4G and by Verizon Fios at 5G.I have Verizon Fios 300M download and upload. Initially, I used an A7, thinking that at 2.4GHz, the router speed is 450M which is higher than iPhone’s 144M(“n”) and 195M(“ax), surely shouldn’t be a problem. But speed test showed that I got only 60M download and 80M upload from the best channel and 20M bandwidth (I tested all the channels and bandwidth combinations).60M is too slow for me because I have several devices (such as security cameras) using 2.4G. So I called TP Link support line to see what I had done wrong. Most customer supports didn’t know what the problem was the and finally I was connected to a high level support. She said that in real life, I had to multiply the speed by 30-50% and guided me through the various specs of the wireless link. I don’t know where the 30-50% comes from, perhaps it was her empirical experience. If I use the average of 40% and assume that applies to the lower speed of the router and the iPhone, which is 144MHz. 40%x144M is 57M. This was about what I got at 2.4G using the A7 router.But she also said something about WiFi 6 router and got me thinking perhaps a WiFi 6 router could improve the speed. (I must say that I got excellent support from TP Link, I had gotten calls twice from the specialist unsolicited and many followup emails. All trying to help me solve the low speed problem.)I then change the A7(AC1700) to an AX21(AX1800), which does support WiFi 6 “ax”.The main advantage of using AX21 is that it raised the iPhone 11 max speed at 2.4G from 144M to 195M, a gain of 51M. And as a result, in real life, the 2.4G link speed seemed to have increased by about the same amount. Speed test showed that at 2.4G, I now got ~90-110M(download, previously 60M when using A7) and 100-120M(upload) with the channel and bandwidth set on auto. Though the download speed is still less than 195M, the link speed has increased by changing to a router that supports ax and has 4 antennas. Have no idea if a more expensive router will further increase the 2.4G speed.However, at 5GHz, both routers give 307M download and 330M upload, limited by Verizon Fios max speed of 300M.When doing speed test, I shut off all 2.4G emitters. I live in a rural area and I suspect there is little interference.A7 has 3 antennas whereas AX21 has four. Is the speed improvement at 2.4G due to the additional antenna or the support of WiFi 6 or both?

  13. We’re going to stream our television & use an antenna. The signal from the old router didn’t quite cut it, so I looked for an alternative. I found the T-P Link AX6000 online & read some reviews and was a bit apprehensive because some said it was hard to set up. In the past I’ve used Netgear and they are good, but I saw this and like what I read.It wasn’t really hard to set up. It was time consuming, however. I still use a hard wired connection for sensitive work I occasionally do. This works for that purpose and the VPN worked well.The Wi-Fi was pretty much seamless. Unfortunately, I have a lot of devices and connecting all of them took a bit of time. I just remembered one that I still need to connect.The Wi-Fi speed doubled near every device in the house compared to the old router. I just used an online speed test to measure the speed. The hard wired computers didn’t have a significant difference in speed. I’m going to get new floors in my home office and will upgrade all the cables to Cat 8, I’m not so sure there will be a significant difference. This router has 8 Ethernet ports, I’d been using 2 routers for my printers & computers, now I just need this one. I know, a switch would have worked, but I had an extra router, so I used it. Besides, I couldn’t find my 10 port switch and didn’t want to buy another one.There are also security features and you have to turn them on manually. It’s a good idea to pay attention to this as there are so many devious people trying to steal your identity, hijack your computer and so much more. I was recently in a couple of cyber security & crimes webinars and the problems are getting worse. So please, pay attention to those security features.I don’t foresee any problems, only time will tell how this router will work. Sorry that I’m not that technical, I just wanted you to know that this router doesn’t require a “network guy” to make it work. If I can do it you can too.For perspective: my house is one level and about 1,600 SF. The router is in one far corner and the signal is good through all the doors & walls. It also works well on the back porch for the television I have out there.

  14. This was purchased to replace my 12 year old Netgear N type router so that i could add the 5GHz band that my security system required. The Router was easy to setup and get going, but i have noticed a reduction in connection strength from my old router, also a reduced range which may be the 5GHz band, but I chose the “auto select best band” option so I would expect when I start getting out of range of the 5GHz the router would switch to the 2.4GHz for that device. I have not done enough testing to see if it is or not, but my signal range has definitely shortened.

  15. I purchased the TP link deco whole home mesh Wi-Fi system based on a recommendation from Wirecutter on the New York Times website. They recommended it as the budget solution to weak Wi-Fi signals in your home.I’ve had the system for four days. In those four days I spent a total of 12 hours trying to get it to work for longer than 10 hours. I’ve been unsuccessful in that effort.The deco system sporadically cuts itself off from my router, leaving me with no Wi-Fi signal. And I don’t have more time to dedicate to finding out exactly what the problem is. I did contact the company’s tech support and they offered to help me via e-mail. The turn around for questions and answers is 24 to 48 hours. Again I don’t have time to spend precious hours going back and forth. I feel the system should be more automated and robust with its User Interface than it is currently. (Yes, I updated the latest firmware updates from the company.What is my skill level? I am a former IT coordinator for a small company and know my way around windows and apple. I am currently using windows 11 and a fifth generation IPad Air with iOS version 15.7. I’ve been running cellular based Wi-Fi routers for eight years. This is my first defeat in my home network. incidentally I used the IPad to download the TP link app that runs the deco system. Because of issues with connecting the deco system to my Netgear Ethernet port I had to use two different email addresses to download the deco app two different times under two different account names. Even that did not solve the issue.The AC 1200 deco S4 system cost about $120 through Amazon. It’s not a lot of money for a whole home mesh system. I bought the system that has one main base station and two satellite stations as the company calls them. I was able to successfully connect the system numerous times and get it operating properly. But for unknown reasons the satellite stations would drop their connection from the base station. Reconfiguring, rebooting, reconnecting, and everything else I could think of did not stabilize the platform. I feared that after the Amazon return window closed that I would be stuck with a system that would be unstable over the long term. And I don’t have unlimited time to figure get out. I also read many of the more detailed customer reviews on Amazon about the system. Apparently Amazon has pooled all the TP link products together under one massive thread with 24,000 customer reviews so I was unable to find exactly what my problem was.I agree with the New York Times review that this is a budget system in terms of dollars but in terms of your time it’s a massive expenditure.I’m giving the product five stars because the flaws in the system are so extensive that they became apparent very quickly and are allowing me to return the product before I’m stuck with three little plastic boat anchors.TP-Link challenge: send me three new little boat anchors, help me stabilize the platform and I’ll revise this review to one star where no one will read it, and I’ll throw in the 20 million user errors that I no doubt made.

  16. The set up of the router was easy for me, I am not a tech savvy. Did the speed test and everything looked fine. But when I worked from home the other day I could not get any internet speed after I connected the company VPN. It worked for my husbands company VPN but not mine. I contacted my IT and they did not have a solution. I do not know if it is the router or my company VPN. I was thinking to keep it just for home use. But it was not too convenient for me to switch back and force with routers when I have to Work form home. I got it at a very cheap price and I would keep it as a back up but I just decided to return it(do not want so many electronic products at home) and hope they can improve this model. This model is not a popular model from Netgear. I got very limited information online. But if you are to use it for home use it is a good router. Fast speed and easy to set up.

  17. I purchased this router to go with the new modem I purchased, because I was tired of paying a monthly rental fee for the cable modem/router combo that my cable company supplied. I don’t really like having a modem/router combo, only because if one or the other stop working or have glitches, it usually will all stop working. I purchased an Surfboard modem and then purchased this router to pair with it. It was very easy to connect it…just had to connect the power cord to the router and connect the ethernet line it from the modem. The only problem I had was the Surfboard app, You connect it all up through the app…it wanted me to scan the QR code, but I couldn’t find one. I finally saw it….it was on the clear wrapping that was on the router…I had thrown it away. I hadn’t noticed that the QR code and the temporary router username and password were on a little label stuck to the clear wrap. After I realized that I threw it away and retrieved it from the trash, I was up and running in about a minute. This router works great with my Surfboard modem.

  18. Got this for a townhome. At first set it up as its own network which worked perfectly fine but then realized I could use it as strictly an access point for the downstairs. It has worked great and no loss of speed (im talking 0% loss) from the main modem/router. I have 600 mbps on both. Works great also as a switch for and hardline connections. Couldn’t be more happy with it, especially at the price!

  19. I purchased this router on the advice of a friend. I have TMobile internet, which is considerably slower than the spectrum I had before. But with free TV through my Roku, I was saving about 100 a month. I installed the router, and bingo! My TMobile internet is twice as fast! No more freezing or buffering! Well worth the $25 I paid for it.

  20. I bought this to replace the router in my Comcast XB7 modem as I use port forwarding and the Comcast interface is so bad and buggy & I have had so many issues with it I got tired of dealing with their incompetence. So I put the XB7 in bridge mode & added this as my router and it is rock solid with no issues.Now I can manage my router the way I want and it works flawlessly. I don’t need 1Gbit ethernet so the for the price this is great.

Leave a reply

Buyerreviews to find best products best reviews guide
Logo
Enable registration in settings - general
Compare items
  • Cameras (0)
  • Phones (0)
Compare